Technological opportunism and radical technology adoption: An application to e-business

被引:351
作者
Srinivasan, R [1 ]
Lilien, GL
Rangaswamy, A
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkg.66.3.47.18508
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using the resource-based view of the firm, the authors hypothesize that differences in adoption of radical technologies among firms can be attributed to a sense-and-respond capability of firms with respect to new technologies, which is termed technological opportunism. Using survey data from senior managers in business-to-business firms, the authors study the adoption of e-business, a radical technology with the potential to alter business models. The authors first establish the distinctiveness of technological opportunism from related constructs, such as organizational innovativeness, and show that it offers a significantly better explanation of technology adoption than existing constructs do. In a follow-up survey of senior managers, the authors investigate the antecedents of technological opportunism and find that organizations can develop technological opportunism by taking specific actions such as focusing on the future, by having top management advocate new technologies, and by becoming more of an adhocracy culture and less of a hierarchy culture. The proposed technological opportunism construct can inform theory development on the relative emphasis on internal (research and development) versus external (buying, licensing) development of technologies and the complementarities in technology orientation and market orientation in the firm. The results can be used by managers who seek to develop the technological opportunism capability of their firms and by those in technology vendor firms who seek to develop segmentation strategies based on the technological opportunism capabilities of their customer firms.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 60
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS - USING MATHEMATICAL-MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSION [J].
ABRAHAMSON, E ;
ROSENKOPF, L .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1993, 18 (03) :487-517
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1975, Markets and Hierarchies
[3]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[4]   STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AND DETERMINISM [J].
BOURGEOIS, LJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1984, 9 (04) :586-596
[5]   A PROCESS MODEL OF INTERNAL CORPORATE VENTURING IN THE DIVERSIFIED MAJOR FIRM [J].
BURGELMAN, RA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1983, 28 (02) :223-244
[6]   MARKETING AND TECHNOLOGY - A STRATEGIC COALIGNMENT [J].
CAPON, N ;
GLAZER, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1987, 51 (03) :1-14
[7]   ISOLATING THE DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVENESS - A SPLIT-POPULATION TOBIT (SPOT) DURATION MODEL OF TIMING AND VOLUME OF FIRST AND REPEAT PURCHASE [J].
CHANDRASHEKARAN, M ;
SINHA, RK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1995, 32 (04) :444-456
[8]   Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize [J].
Chandy, RK ;
Tellis, GJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (04) :474-487
[9]   ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND PERFORMANCE - ROLE OF STRATEGIC CHOICE [J].
CHILD, J .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1972, 6 (01) :1-&
[10]  
Christensen C.M., 1997, INNOVATORS DILEMMA