Analyses of LTR-retrotransposon structures reveal recent and rapid genomic DNA loss in rice

被引:394
作者
Ma, JX [1 ]
Devos, KM
Bennetzen, JL
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Biol Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Genet, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Dept Plant Biol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1101/gr.1466204
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We initially analyzed 11 families of low- and middle-copy-number long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons in rice to determine how their structures have diverged from their predicted ancestral forms. These elements, many highly fragmented, were identified oil the basis of sequence homology and structural characteristics. The 11 families, totaling 1000 elements, have copy numbers ranging from 1 to 278. Less than one-quarter of these elements are intact, whereas the remaining are solo LTRs and variously truncated fragments. We also analyzed two highly repetitive families (Osr8 and Osr30) of LTR retrotransposons and observed the same results. Our data indicate that unequal homologous recombination and illegitimate recombination are primarily responsible for LTR-retrotransposon removal. Further analysis suggests that most of the detectable LTR retrotransposons in rice inserted less than 8 million years ago, and have now lost over two-thirds of their encoded sequences. Hence, we predict that the half-life of LTR-retrotransposon sequences in rice is less than 6 million years. Moreover, our data demonstrate that at least 22% (97 Mb) of the Current rice genome is comprised of LTR-retrotransposon sequences, and that more than 190 Mb of LTR-retrotransposon sequences have been deleted from the rice genome in the last 8 million years.
引用
收藏
页码:860 / 869
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [21] The age of Alu subfamilies
    Kapitonov, V
    Jurka, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1996, 42 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [22] Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
    Kaul, S
    Koo, HL
    Jenkins, J
    Rizzo, M
    Rooney, T
    Tallon, LJ
    Feldblyum, T
    Nierman, W
    Benito, MI
    Lin, XY
    Town, CD
    Venter, JC
    Fraser, CM
    Tabata, S
    Nakamura, Y
    Kaneko, T
    Sato, S
    Asamizu, E
    Kato, T
    Kotani, H
    Sasamoto, S
    Ecker, JR
    Theologis, A
    Federspiel, NA
    Palm, CJ
    Osborne, BI
    Shinn, P
    Conway, AB
    Vysotskaia, VS
    Dewar, K
    Conn, L
    Lenz, CA
    Kim, CJ
    Hansen, NF
    Liu, SX
    Buehler, E
    Altafi, H
    Sakano, H
    Dunn, P
    Lam, B
    Pham, PK
    Chao, Q
    Nguyen, M
    Yu, GX
    Chen, HM
    Southwick, A
    Lee, JM
    Miranda, M
    Toriumi, MJ
    Davis, RW
    [J]. NATURE, 2000, 408 (6814) : 796 - 815
  • [24] Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes:: Large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny
    Ku, HM
    Vision, T
    Liu, JP
    Tanksley, SD
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (16) : 9121 - 9126
  • [25] Plant retrotransposons
    Kumar, A
    Bennetzen, JL
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 1999, 33 : 479 - 532
  • [26] MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software
    Kumar, S
    Tamura, K
    Jakobsen, IB
    Nei, M
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2001, 17 (12) : 1244 - 1245
  • [27] Marillonnet S, 1998, GENETICS, V150, P1245
  • [28] MASSON P, 1987, GENETICS, V117, P117
  • [29] Long terminal repeat retrotransposons of Oryza sativa
    Eugene M McCarthy
    Jingdong Liu
    Gao Lizhi
    John F McDonald
    [J]. Genome Biology, 3 (10)
  • [30] Abundance, distribution, and transcriptional activity of repetitive elements in the maize genome
    Meyers, BC
    Tingley, SV
    Morgante, M
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2001, 11 (10) : 1660 - 1676