Improving school breakfasts: Effects of the CATCH eat smart program on the nutrient content of school breakfasts

Background. This paper describes the impact of the Eat Smart School Nutrition Program, the food service component of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH), on the percentage of calories from total fat and saturated fat and the sodium content of school breakfasts. Methods. Fifty-nine of the 96 CATCH schools offered breakfast. We collected 5 consecutive days of school breakfast menu, recipe, and vendor product information at three periods to assess the nutrient content of the school menus as offered. Results. At baseline (Fall 1991), intervention school breakfasts provided 28% of calories from total fat and control schools 30%. Decreases occurred over time in both groups, but no significant differences were attributable to the intervention (adjusted mean difference = -0.4; P = 0.77). Saturated fat exceeded the Eat Smart goal at baseline in all schools and by follow-up (Spring 1994), the reduction in mean percentage of calories from saturated fat was greater in intervention than in control schools (adjusted mean difference = -1.6%; P = 0.052). Sodium goals were not achieved. Mean calorie levels were maintained at or above Eat Smart goals throughout the study in both groups. Differences over time in other dietary variables (percentage of calories from protein and carbohydrate and mean levels of protein, carbohydrate, calcium, iron, vitamin A value, vitamin C, total sugars, and dietary fiber) were not statistically significant between groups. No significant reductions in student participation in the School Breakfast Program (SEP) occurred. Conclusions. The Eat Smart food service intervention improved school breakfast composition, but not significantly more so than in control schools. Fat and saturated fat in school breakfasts were lowered while maintaining calories, other essential nutrient levels, and student participation in the SEP. Secular trends and also the possibility that control schools were affected by the Eat Smart intervention may account for these findings. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.