Inhibitory spillover: Intentional motor inhibition produces incidental limbic inhibition via right inferior frontal cortex

被引:114
作者
Berkman, Elliot T. [1 ]
Burklund, Lisa [1 ]
Lieberman, Matthew D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
RESPONSE-INHIBITION; NEGATIVE EMOTION; HUMAN AMYGDALA; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; BRAIN ACTIVATION; LIMITED RESOURCE; NEURAL SYSTEMS; SELF-CONTROL; FMRI; METHAMPHETAMINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.084
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Neurocognitive studies have observed rIFC involvement in motor, cognitive, and affective inhibition, suggesting that rIFC is a common inhibitory mechanism across psychological domains. If true, intentional inhibition in one domain may have unintended inhibitory effects ("spillover") in other domains. The present study used an emotional go/no-go task that produces responses in both motor and affective domains, but induces intentional inhibition in only the motor domain. Data support the hypothesis that intentional inhibition in the motor domain, via rIFC, produces inhibitory spillover in the affective domain. Specifically, we observed increased rIFC along with reduced amygdala activity when participants intentionally inhibited motor responses during the presentation of negatively-valenced stimuli, and greater inverse connectivity between these regions during motor inhibition in a PPI analysis. Given the absence of intentional affect regulation, these results Suggest that intentional inhibition of a motor response dampens the amygdala activation coincident with affective stimuli to the extent that rIFC activation is higher. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 712
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]  
Parrott W.G., 1993, HDB MENTAL CONTROL, P278
[32]   Differences in cortical activity between methamphetamine-dependent and healthy individuals performing a facial affect matching task [J].
Payer, Doris E. ;
Lieberman, Matthew D. ;
Monterosso, John R. ;
Xue, Jiansong ;
Fong, Timothy W. ;
London, Edythe D. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2008, 93 (1-2) :93-102
[33]   Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention [J].
Pessoa, L ;
McKenna, M ;
Gutierrez, E ;
Ungerleider, LG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (17) :11458-11463
[34]   Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI [J].
Phan, KL ;
Wager, T ;
Taylor, SF ;
Liberzon, I .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (02) :331-348
[35]   Neural substrates for voluntary suppression of negative affect: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study [J].
Phan, KL ;
Fitzgerald, DA ;
Nathan, PJ ;
Moore, GJ ;
Uhde, TW ;
Tancer, ME .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 57 (03) :210-219
[36]   Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition [J].
Picton, Terence W. ;
Stuss, Donald T. ;
Alexander, Michael P. ;
Shallice, Tim ;
Binns, Malcolm A. ;
Gillingham, Susan .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2007, 17 (04) :826-838
[37]   Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? [J].
Poldrack, RA .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (02) :59-63
[38]   Preliminary evidence of reduced cognitive inhibition in methamphetamine-dependent individuals [J].
Salo, R ;
Nordahl, TE ;
Possin, K ;
Leamon, M ;
Gibson, DR ;
Galloway, GP ;
Flynn, NM ;
Henik, A ;
Pfefferbaum, A ;
Sullivan, EV .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2002, 111 (01) :65-74
[39]   The interaction of emotional and cognitive neural systems in emotionally guided response inhibition [J].
Shafritz, Keith M. ;
Collins, Susan H. ;
Blumberg, Hilary P. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 31 (01) :468-475
[40]   Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks, demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent [J].
Simmonds, Daniel J. ;
Pekar, James J. ;
Mostofsky, Stewart H. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2008, 46 (01) :224-232