Correlated inhibitory and excitatory inputs to the coincidence detector: Analytical solution

被引:6
作者
Mikula, S [1 ]
Niebur, E
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Krieger Mind Brain Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Neurosci, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS | 2004年 / 15卷 / 05期
关键词
coincidence detector; inhibition; neural code; synchrony;
D O I
10.1109/TNN.2004.832708
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We present a solution for the steady-state output rate of an ideal coincidence detector receiving an arbitrary number of excitatory and inhibitory input spike trains. All excitatory spike trains have identical binomial count distributions (which includes Poisson statistics as a special case) and arbitrary pairwise cross correlations between them. The same applies to the inhibitory inputs, and the rates and correlation functions of excitatory and inhibitory populations may be the same or different from each other. Thus, for each population independently, the correlation may range from complete independence to perfect correlation (identical processes). We find that inhibition, if made sufficiently strong, will result in an inverted U-shaped curve for the output rate of a coincidence detector as a function of input rates for the case of identical inhibitory and excitory input rates. This leads to the prediction that higher presynaptic (input) rates may lead to lower postsynaptic (output) rates where the output rate may rail faster than the inverse of the input rate, and shows some qualitative similarities to the case of purely excitatory inputs with synaptic depression. In general, we find that including inhibition invariably and significantly increases the behavioral repertoire of the coincidence detector over the case of pure excitatory input.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 962
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abeles M., 1991, CORTICONICS
[2]   The impulses produced by sensory nerve-endings. Part 2. The response of a single end-organ. [J].
Adrian, ED ;
Zotterman, Y .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1926, 61 (02) :151-171
[3]   THE EFFECT OF SYNCHRONIZED INPUTS AT THE SINGLE NEURON LEVEL [J].
BERNANDER, O ;
KOCH, C ;
USHER, M .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1994, 6 (04) :622-641
[4]   Long-range synchronization of γ and β oscillations and the plasticity of excitatory and inhibitory synapses:: A network model [J].
Bibbig, A ;
Traub, RD ;
Whittington, MA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 88 (04) :1634-1654
[5]   The effects of pair-wise and higher-order correlations on the firing rate of a postsynaptic neuron [J].
Bohte, SM ;
Spekreijse, H ;
Roelfsema, PR .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2000, 12 (01) :153-179
[6]  
BORGERS C, 2000, NEURAL COMPUT, V15, P509
[7]   EFFECTS OF INHIBITION AND DENDRITIC SATURATION IN SIMULATED NEOCORTICAL PYRAMIDAL CELLS [J].
BUSH, PC ;
SEJNOWSKI, TJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 71 (06) :2183-2193
[8]   The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo [J].
Destexhe, A ;
Rudolph, M ;
Paré, D .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 4 (09) :739-751
[9]  
FENG J, 2001, J THEORY BIOL, V7, P61
[10]   Impact of correlated inputs on the output of the integrate-and-fire model [J].
Feng, JF ;
Brown, D .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2000, 12 (03) :671-692