Utilization and Yield of Surveillance Colonoscopy in the Continued Follow-Up Study of the Polyp Prevention Trial

被引:101
作者
Laiyemo, Adeyinka O. [1 ]
Pinsky, Paul F. [2 ]
Marcus, Pamela M.
Lanza, Elaine [3 ]
Cross, Amanda J. [4 ]
Schatzkin, Arthur [4 ]
Schoen, Robert E. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Canc Prevent Fellowship Program, Off Prevent Oncol,Biometry Res Grp, Canc Prevent Div, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Canc Prevent Div, Early Detect Res Grp, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NCI, Lab Canc Prevent, Ctr Canc Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, Nutr Epidemiol Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Dept Med & Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Univ Pittsburgh Canc Inst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; CLINICAL GUIDELINES; NATIONAL-SURVEY; HIGH-FIBER; BODY-SIZE; LOW-FAT; POLYPECTOMY; RECURRENCE; RATIONALE; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.009
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims:: Prospective information on the use and yield of surveillance colonoscopy is limited. We examined the use and yield of surveillance colonoscopy among participants in the Polyp Prevention Trial (PPT) after the 4-year dietary intervention trial ended. Methods: We followed a cohort of 1297 participants. We calculated the cumulative probability of posttrial colonoscopy and investigated the yield and predictive factors for adenoma and advanced adenoma recurrence over a mean time of 5.9 years. Results: Seven-hundred seventy-four subjects (59.7%) had a repeat colonoscopy. Among 431 subjects with low-risk adenomas (1-2 nonadvanced adenomas) at baseline and no adenoma recurrence at the end of the PPT (lowest-risk category), 30.3% underwent a repeat colonoscopy within 4 years. Among 55 subjects who had high-risk adenomas (advanced adenoma and/or >= 3 nonadvanced adenomas) at baseline and again at the final PPT colonoscopy (highest-risk category), 41.3% had a colonoscopy within 3 years and 63.5% had an examination within 5 years. The cumulative yield of advanced adenoma through 6 years was 3.6% for the lowest-risk category, 38.9% for the highest-risk category, and ranged from 6.6% to 13.8% for intermediate-risk categories. An advanced adenoma at the final PPT colonoscopy was associated significantly with an advanced adenoma recurrence during surveillance (hazard ratio, 6.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.5-15.4). Conclusions: Surveillance colonoscopy was overused for low-risk subjects and underused for high-risk subjects. Advanced adenoma yield corresponded with the adenoma risk category. Resource consumption can be better managed by aligning use with the risk of adenoma recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 567
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Strategies to Address Increased Demand for Colonoscopy: Guidelines in an Open Endoscopy Practice [J].
Baron, Todd H. ;
Kimery, Brenda D. ;
Sorbi, Darius ;
Gorkis, Linda C. ;
Leighton, Jonathan A. ;
Fleischer, David E. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 2 (02) :178-182
[2]   Colorectal screening after polypectomy: A national survey study of primary care physicians [J].
Boolchand, Vikram ;
Olds, Gregory ;
Singh, Joseph ;
Singh, Pankaj ;
Chak, Amitabh ;
Cooper, Gregory S. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 145 (09) :654-659
[3]   Association between body size and colorectal adenoma recurrence [J].
Jacobs, Elizabeth T. ;
Martinez, Maria Elena ;
Alberts, David S. ;
Jiang, Ruiyun ;
Lance, Peter ;
Lowe, Kimberly A. ;
Thompson, Patricia A. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 5 (08) :982-990
[4]  
Lanza E, 1996, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V5, P385
[5]   The polyp prevention trial-continued follow-up study: No effect of a low-fat, high-fiber, high-fruit, and -vegetable diet on adenoma recurrence eight years after randomization [J].
Lanza, Elaine ;
Yu, Binbing ;
Murphy, Gwen ;
Albert, Paul S. ;
Caan, Bette ;
Marshall, James R. ;
Lance, Peter ;
Paskett, Electra D. ;
Weissfeld, Joel ;
Slattery, Marty ;
Burt, Randall ;
Iber, Frank ;
Shike, Moshe ;
Kikendall, James W. ;
Brewer, Brenda K. ;
Schatzkin, Arthur .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2007, 16 (09) :1745-1752
[6]   Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States [J].
Lieberman, DA ;
De Garmo, PL ;
Fleischer, DE ;
Eisen, GM ;
Helfand, M .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 118 (03) :619-624
[7]   Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy [J].
Lieberman, David A. ;
Weiss, David G. ;
Harford, William V. ;
Ahnen, Dennis J. ;
Provenzale, Dawn ;
Sontag, Stephen J. ;
Schnell, Thomas G. ;
Chejfec, Gregorio ;
Campbell, Donald R. ;
Kidao, Jayashri ;
Bond, John H. ;
Nelson, Douglas B. ;
Triadafilopoulos, George ;
Ramirez, Francisco C. ;
Collins, Judith F. ;
Johnston, Tiina K. ;
Mcquaid, Kenneth R. ;
Garewal, Harinder ;
Sampliner, Richard E. ;
Esquivel, Romeo ;
Robertson, Douglas .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 133 (04) :1077-1085
[8]   The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer [J].
Mandel, JS ;
Church, TR ;
Bond, JH ;
Ederer, F ;
Geisser, MS ;
Mongin, SJ ;
Snover, DC ;
Schuman, LM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (22) :1603-1607
[9]   Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy [J].
Mysliwiec, PA ;
Brown, ML ;
Klabunde, CN ;
Ransohoff, DF .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (04) :264-271
[10]   Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas [J].
Schatzkin, A ;
Lanza, E ;
Corle, D ;
Lance, P ;
Iber, F ;
Caan, B ;
Shike, M ;
Weissfeld, J ;
Burt, R ;
Cooper, MR ;
Kikendall, JW ;
Cahill, J ;
Freedman, L ;
Marshall, J ;
Schoen, RE ;
Slattery, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (16) :1149-1155