Molecular classification of breast cancer: implications for selection of adjuvant chemotherapy

被引:99
作者
Andre, Fabrice [1 ]
Pusztai, Lajos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77230 USA
来源
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY | 2006年 / 3卷 / 11期
关键词
chemotherapy; classifier; estrogen receptor; predictive; prognostic;
D O I
10.1038/ncponc0636
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with stage I - III breast cancer but it is being increasingly recognized that the benefit is not equal for all patients. Molecular characteristics of the cancer affect sensitivity to chemotherapy. In general, estrogen-receptor-negative disease is more sensitive to chemotherapy than estrogren-receptor-positive disease. Large-scale genomic analyses of breast cancer suggest that further molecular subsets may exist within the categories defined by hormone receptor status. It is hoped that the new molecular classification schemes might improve patient selection for therapy. Before any new molecular classification ( or predictive test) is adopted for routine clinical use, however, several criteria need to be met. There must be an agreed and reproducible method by which to assign molecular class to a new case. Cancers that belong to different molecular classes must show differences in disease outcome and treatment efficacy that affect management and treatment selection. Also desirable are results from prospective clinical trials that demonstrate improved patient outcome when the new test is used in decision-making, compared with the current standard of care. This Review describes the current limitations and future promises of gene-expression-based molecular classification of breast cancer and how it might impact on selection of adjuvant therapy for individual patients.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 632
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]
High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses [J].
Abd El-Rehim, DM ;
Ball, G ;
Pinder, SE ;
Rakha, E ;
Paish, C ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Macmillan, D ;
Blamey, RW ;
Ellis, IO .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 116 (03) :340-350
[2]
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[3]
Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer [J].
Ayers, M ;
Symmans, WF ;
Stec, J ;
Damokosh, AI ;
Clark, E ;
Hess, K ;
Lecocke, M ;
Metivier, J ;
Booser, D ;
Ibrahim, N ;
Valero, V ;
Royce, M ;
Arun, B ;
Whitman, G ;
Ross, J ;
Sneige, N ;
Hortobagyi, GN ;
Pusztai, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (12) :2284-2293
[4]
2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: Clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J].
Bast, RC ;
Ravdin, P ;
Hayes, DF ;
Bates, S ;
Fritsche, H ;
Jessup, JM ;
Kemeny, N ;
Locker, GY ;
Mennel, RG ;
Somerfield, MR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1865-1878
[5]
The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: Preliminary results from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27 [J].
Bear, HD ;
Anderson, S ;
Brown, A ;
Smith, R ;
Mamounas, EP ;
Fisher, B ;
Margolese, R ;
Theoret, H ;
Soran, A ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Wolmark, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (22) :4165-4174
[6]
Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer [J].
Berry, DA ;
Cirrincione, C ;
Henderson, IC ;
Citron, ML ;
Budman, DR ;
Goldstein, LJ ;
Martino, S ;
Perez, EA ;
Muss, HB ;
Norton, L ;
Hudis, C ;
Winer, EP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (14) :1658-1667
[7]
Effect of mutated TP53 on response of advanced breast cancers to high-dose chemotherapy [J].
Bertheau, P ;
Plassa, F ;
Espié, M ;
Turpin, E ;
de Roquancourt, A ;
Marty, M ;
Lerebours, F ;
Beuzard, Y ;
Janin, A ;
de Thé, H .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9336) :852-854
[8]
Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 668 postmenopausal women:: Results of the tamoxifen or arimidex randomized group efficacy and tolerability study [J].
Bonneterre, J ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Krzakowski, M ;
Mauriac, L ;
Koralewski, P ;
Vergote, I ;
Webster, A ;
Steinberg, M ;
von Euler, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (22) :3748-3757
[9]
Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer [J].
Buyse, Marc ;
Loi, Sherene ;
van't Veer, Laura ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Delorenzi, Mauro ;
Glas, Annuska M. ;
d'Assignies, Mahasti Saghatchian ;
Bergh, Jonas ;
Lidereau, Rosette ;
Ellis, Paul ;
Harris, Adrian ;
Bogaerts, Jan ;
Therasse, Patrick ;
Floore, Arno ;
Amakrane, Mohamed ;
Piette, Fanny ;
Rutgers, Emiel ;
Sotiriou, Christos ;
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Piccart, Martine J. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1183-1192
[10]
Secondary leukemia after epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer patients:: 16 years experience of the French Adjuvant Study Group [J].
Campone, M ;
Roché, H ;
Kerbrat, P ;
Bonneterre, J ;
Romestaing, P ;
Fargeot, P ;
Namer, M ;
Monnier, A ;
Montcuquet, P ;
Goudier, MJ ;
Fumoleau, P .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (08) :1343-1351