Assessment of local predation risk: the role of subthreshold concentrations of chemical alarm cues

被引:59
作者
Brown, GE
Poirier, JF
Adrian, JC
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Biol, Montreal, PQ H4B 1R6, Canada
[2] Union Coll, Dept Chem, Sci & Engn Ctr, Schenectady, NY 12308 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
chemical alarm cues; Ostariophysan fishes; predator-prey interactions; antipredator behavior; vigilance; risk assessment; threat-sensitive trade-offs;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/arh084
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The ability to accurately assess local predation risk is critical to prey individuals, as it allows them to maximize threat-sensitive trade-offs between predator avoidance and other fitness related activities. A wide range of taxonomically diverse prey (including many freshwater fishes) relies on chemical alarm cues (alarm pheromones) as their primary information source for local risk assessment. However, the value of chemical alarm cues has been questioned due to the availability of additional sensory inputs (i.e., visual cues) and the lack of an overt antipredator response under conditions of low perceived risk. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that chemical alarm cues at concentrations below the point at which they elicit an overt behavioral response function to increase vigilance towards other sensory modalities (i.e., visual alarm cues). Shoals of glowlight tetras (Hemigrammus erythrozonus) exposed to the subthreshold concentration of hypoxanthine-3-N-oxide (the putative Ostariophysan alarm pheromone) did not exhibit an overt antipredator response in the absence of secondary visual cues (not different than the distilled water control). However, when exposed to the sight of a visually alarmed conspecific, they significantly increased the intensity of their antipredator response (not different from shoals exposed to the suprathreshold alarm cue). This study demonstrates that prey may benefit from responding to low concentration alarm cues by increasing vigilance towards secondary cues during local risk assessment, even in the absence of an overt behavioral response. By increasing vigilance towards secondary risk assessment cues in the presence of a low risk chemical cue, individuals are likely able to maximize the threat-sensitive tradeoffs between predator avoidance and other fitness related activities.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 815
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   The evolution of chemical alarm signals: Attracting predators benefits alarm signal senders [J].
Chivers, DP ;
Brown, GE ;
Smith, RJF .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1996, 148 (04) :649-659
[12]   Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: A review and prospectus [J].
Chivers, DP ;
Smith, RJF .
ECOSCIENCE, 1998, 5 (03) :338-352
[13]   Sensory compensation and the detection of predators: the interaction between chemical and visual information [J].
Hartman, EJ ;
Abrahams, MV .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 267 (1443) :571-575
[14]   The scent of death: Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals [J].
Kats, LB ;
Dill, LM .
ECOSCIENCE, 1998, 5 (03) :361-394
[15]   BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSE OF SOLITARY FATHEAD MINNOWS, PIMEPHALES-PROMELAS, TO ALARM SUBSTANCE [J].
LAWRENCE, BJ ;
SMITH, RJF .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1989, 15 (01) :209-219
[16]   Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: The predation risk allocation hypothesis [J].
Lima, SL ;
Bednekoff, PA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1999, 153 (06) :649-659
[17]   BEHAVIORAL DECISIONS MADE UNDER THE RISK OF PREDATION - A REVIEW AND PROSPECTUS [J].
LIMA, SL ;
DILL, LM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1990, 68 (04) :619-640
[18]   Is there a fish alarm pheromone? A wild study and critique [J].
Magurran, AE ;
Irving, PW ;
Henderson, PA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 263 (1376) :1551-1556
[19]  
MAGURRAN AE, 1988, ETHOLOGY, V78, P153
[20]   Response of pumpkinseed sunfish to conspecific chemical alarm cues: an interaction between ontogeny and stimulus concentration [J].
Marcus, JP ;
Brown, GE .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2003, 81 (10) :1671-1677