In search of a good death: Observations of patients, families, and providers

被引:720
作者
Steinhauser, KE
Clipp, EC
McNeilly, M
Christakis, NA
McIntyre, LM
Tulsky, JA
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Duke Vet Affairs Med Ctr 152, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Inst Multiculturalism, Durham, NC USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Despite a recent increase in the attention given to improving end-of-life care, our understanding of what constitutes a good death is surprisingly lacking. The purpose of this study was to gather descriptions of the components of a good death from patients, families, and providers through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Seventy-five participants-including physicians, nurses. social workers, chaplains, hospice volunteers, patients, and recently bereaved family members-were recruited from a university medical center, a Veterans Affairs medical center, and a community hospice. Participants identified six major components of a good death: pain and symptom management, clear decision making, preparation for death, completion, contributing to others, and affirmation of the whole person. The six themes are process-oriented attributes of a good death, and each has biomedical, psychological, social, and spiritual components. Physicians' discussions of a good death differed greatly from those of other groups. Physicians offered the most biomedical perspective, and patients, families, and other health care professionals defined a broad range of attributes integral to the quality of dying. Although there is no "right" way to die, these six themes may be used as a framework for understanding what participants tend to value at the end of life. Biomedical care is critical, but it is only a point of departure toward total end-of-life care. For patients and families, psychosocial and spiritual issues are as important as physiologic concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 832
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL TO IMPROVE CARE FOR SERIOUSLY ILL HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - THE STUDY TO UNDERSTAND PROGNOSES AND PREFERENCES FOR OUTCOMES AND RISKS OF TREATMENTS (SUPPORT) [J].
KNAUS, WA ;
CONNORS, AF ;
DAWSON, NV ;
DESBIENS, NA ;
FULKERSON, WJ ;
GOLDMAN, L ;
LYNN, J ;
OYE, RK ;
BERGNER, M ;
DAMIANO, A ;
HAKIM, R ;
MURPHY, DJ ;
TENO, J ;
VIRNIG, B ;
WAGNER, DP ;
WU, AW ;
YASUI, Y ;
ROBINSON, DK ;
KRELING, B ;
DULAC, J ;
BAKER, R ;
HOLAYEL, S ;
MEEKS, T ;
MUSTAFA, M ;
VEGARRA, J ;
ALZOLA, C ;
HARRELL, FE ;
COOK, EF ;
HAMEL, MB ;
PETERSON, L ;
PHILLIPS, RS ;
TSEVAT, J ;
FORROW, L ;
LESKY, L ;
DAVIS, R ;
KRESSIN, N ;
SOLZAN, J ;
PUOPOLO, AL ;
BARRETT, LQ ;
BUCKO, N ;
BROWN, D ;
BURNS, M ;
FOSKETT, C ;
HOZID, A ;
KEOHANE, C ;
MARTINEZ, C ;
MCWEENEY, D ;
MELIA, D ;
OTTO, S ;
SHEEHAN, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (20) :1591-1598
[22]  
Krueger R, 1994, A Practical Guide to Applied Research, VFirst
[23]   Care at the end of life: Guiding practice where there are no easy answers [J].
Lo, B ;
Snyder, L ;
Sox, HC .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 130 (09) :772-774
[24]   Discussing palliative care with patients [J].
Lo, B ;
Quill, T ;
Tulsky, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 130 (09) :744-749
[25]  
MCCORMICK TR, 1995, WESTERN J MED, V163, P236
[26]   Psychological intervention with military personnel in Rwanda [J].
Rosebush, PA .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 1998, 163 (08) :559-563
[27]   Quality end-of-life care - Patients' perspectives [J].
Singer, PA ;
Martin, DK ;
Kelner, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (02) :163-168
[28]   The enormity of the task - SUPPORT and changing practice [J].
Solomon, MZ .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1995, 25 (06) :S28-S32
[29]   THE ROLE OF HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS AND SIGNIFICANT OTHERS IN EVALUATING THE QUALITY-OF-LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC DISEASE - A REVIEW [J].
SPRANGERS, MAG ;
AARONSON, NK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (07) :743-760
[30]  
Starr Paul., 1982, SOCIAL TRANSFORMATIO