Evaluation of a miniature electromagnetic position tracker

被引:82
作者
Hummel, J
Figl, M
Kollmann, C
Bergmann, H
Birkfellner, W
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Biomed Engn & Phys, Gen Hosp, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Hosp, CARCAS Grp, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
magnetic tracking system; accuracy; computer aided surgery; frameless stereotaxy;
D O I
10.1118/1.1508377
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The advent of miniaturized electromagnetic digitizers opens a variety of potential clinical applications for computer aided interventions using flexible instruments; endoscopes or catheters can easily be tracked within the body. With respect to the new applications, the systematic distortions induced by various materials such as closed metallic loops, wire guides, catheters, and ultrasound scan heads were systematically evaluated in this paper for a new commercial tracking system. We employed the electromagnetic tracking system Aurora(TM) (Mednetix/CH, NDI/Can); data were acquired using the serial port of a PC running SuSE Linux 7.1 (SuSE, Gmbh, Nurnberg). Objects introduced into the digitizer volume included wire loops of different diameters, wire guides, optical tracking tools, an ultrasonic (US) scan head, an endoscope with radial ultrasound scan head and various other objects used in operating rooms and interventional suites. Beyond this, we determined the influence of a C-arm fluoroscopy unit. To quantify the reliability of the system, the miniaturized sensor was mounted on a nonmetallic measurement rack while the transmitter was fixed at three different distances within the digitizer range. The tracker was shown to be more sensitive to distortions caused by materials close to the emitter (average distortion error 13.6 mm +/- 16.6 mm for wire loops positioned at a distance between 100 mm. and 200 mm from the emitter). Distortions caused by materials near the sensor (distances smaller than 100 mm) are small (typical error 2.2 mm +/- 1.9 mm). The C-arm fluoroscopy unit caused considerable distortions and limits the reliability of the tracker (distortion error 18.6 mm +/- 24.9 mm). Distortions resulting from the US scan head are high at distances smaller than about 100 turn from the emitter. The distortions also increase when the scan head is positioned horizontally and close to the sensor (average error 4.1 mm +/- 1.5 mm when the scan head is positioned within a distance of 100 mm from the sensor). The distortions are slightly higher when the ultrasound machine is switched on. We also evaluated the influence of common medical instruments on distance measurements. For these measurements the average deviation from the known distance of 200 mm amounted to 3.0 mm +/- 1.5 mm(undistorted distance measurement 1.5 mm +/- 0.3 mm). The deviations also depend on the relative orientation between emitter and sensor. The results demonstrate that the miniature tracking system opens up new perspectives with regard to surgery applications where a flexible instrument is to be tracked within the body. Significant distortions caused by metallic objects only occur in the worst cases, for example, in the presence of a closed, unisiolated wire loop or a C-arm fluorescence unit close to the emitter and which can be avoided by suitable usage. (C) 2002 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2205 / 2212
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Systematic distortions in magnetic position digitizers [J].
Birkfellner, W ;
Watzinger, F ;
Wanschitz, F ;
Enislidis, G ;
Kollmann, C ;
Rafolt, D ;
Nowotny, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (11) :2242-2248
[2]   Calibration of tracking systems in a surgical environment [J].
Birkfellner, W ;
Watzinger, F ;
Wanschitz, F ;
Ewers, R ;
Bergmann, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (05) :737-742
[3]   Calibration of position and angular data from a magnetic tracking device [J].
Day, JS ;
Murdoch, DJ ;
Dumas, GA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 33 (08) :1039-1045
[4]  
De Groot NM, 2000, J CARDIOVASC ELECTR, V11, P1183
[5]   In vitro evaluation of three-dimensional ultrasonography based on magnetic scanhead tracking [J].
Gilja, OH ;
Hausken, T ;
Olafsson, S ;
Matre, K ;
Odegaard, S .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 24 (08) :1161-1167
[6]  
HARTOV A, 1999, NEUROSURG FOCUS, V6
[7]   Noninvasive tracking of patient's head movements during computer-assisted intranasal microscopic surgery [J].
Hauser, R ;
Westermann, B ;
Probst, R .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1997, 107 (04) :491-499
[8]   Frameless neuronavigation applied to endoscopic neurosurgery [J].
Hopf, NJ ;
Grunert, P ;
Darabi, K ;
Busert, C ;
Bettag, M .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 42 (04) :187-193
[9]   Laboratory assessment of a miniature electromagnetic tracker [J].
Hummel, J ;
Birkfellner, W ;
Figl, T ;
Haider, C ;
Hanel, R ;
Bergmann, H .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: VISUALIZATION, IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, AND DISPLAY, 2002, 4681 :94-99
[10]   Stereotactic computer-assisted navigational sinus surgery: Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking system with the tissue debrider and when utilizing different headsets for the same patient [J].
Javer, AR ;
Kuhn, FA ;
Smith, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2000, 14 (06) :361-365