Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector computed tomographic angiography

被引:77
作者
Gopal, Ambarish [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Song S. [1 ,2 ]
Karlsberg, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Young, Emily [1 ,2 ]
Waggoner, Joshua [1 ,2 ]
Ahmadi, Naser [1 ,2 ]
Pal, Raveen S. [1 ,2 ]
Leal, John [1 ,2 ]
Karlsberg, Ronald P. [1 ,2 ]
Budoff, Matthew J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harbor UCLA, Los Angeles Biomed Res Inst, Torrance, CA 90502 USA
[2] Cardiovasc Med Grp, Beverly Hills, CA USA
关键词
Radiation exposure; Radiation reduction; Millisievert; Noninvasive angiography; CTA; CT angiography; Computed tomographic angiography; Multidetector computed tomography; MDCT; Multislice computed tomography; MSCT; Prospective ECG-triggering; TUBE-CURRENT MODULATION; NONINVASIVE CORONARY-ANGIOGRAPHY; DUAL-SOURCE CT; IMAGE QUALITY; DOSE REDUCTION; ARTERY-DISEASE; HEART; ATTENUATION; FEASIBILITY; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10554-008-9396-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Current 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic scanners (MDCT) utilize retrospective overlapping helical acquisition (RS-OHA) which imparts a higher than desired radiation dose. Although the radiation burden of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) can be efficiently reduced by dose modulation and limiting field of view, a further decrease in radiation without compromising diagnostic image quality would be indeed very desirable. An alternative imaging mode is the axial prospective ECG-triggering acquisition (prospective gating). This study was done to compare the effective radiation dose and the image quality with two techniques to reduce radiation doses with CTA studies utilizing 64-MDCT scanners. The study included 149 consecutive patients (48 females and 101 males) 64-MDCT (mean age = 67 +/- A 11 years, 72.2% male). Patients underwent CT coronary angiography using one of three algorithms: retrospective triggering with dose modulation; prospective triggering with padding (step and shoot acquisition with additional adjacent phases); and prospective triggering without padding (single phase acquisition only). Based on body habitus, two different voltages were utilized: 100 kVp (< 85 kg) or 120 kVp (> 85 kg). Radiation doses and image quality (signal to noise ratio) was measured for each patient, and compared between different acquisition protocols. The signal to-noise ratio of the ascending aorta (SNR-AA) was calculated from the mean pixel values of the contrast-filled left ventricular chamber divided by the standard deviation of these pixel values. Use of 100 kVp reduced radiation dose 41.5% using prospective triggering and 39.6% using retrospective imaging as compared to 120 kVp (P < 0.001). Use of prospective imaging reduced radiation exposure by 82.6% as compared to retrospective imaging (P < 0.001). Using both prospective imaging and 100 kVp without padding (single phase data, no other phases obtained), radiation dose was reduced by 90% (P < 0.001). In terms of image quality, the coefficient of variation of ascending aortic contrast enhancement between kVp of 120 and kVp of 100 was 6% (1.05, 95 CI 0.93-1.17), and 7.8% (0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.2) at the pulmonary artery. The prospective ECG-Triggered acquisition and 100 kVp images were of diagnostic quality, allowing adequate assessment in all patients. CTA using PA and 100 kVp reduced the radiation dose by up to 90% without compromising the image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 416
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
MDCT of the coronary arteries: Feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose [J].
Abada, Hicham T. ;
Larchez, Christophe ;
Daoud, Beatrice ;
Sigal-Cinqualbre, Anne ;
Paul, Jean-Francois .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (06) :S387-S390
[2]
Automatic tube-current modulation in CT -: A comparison between different solutions [J].
Althén, JN .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :308-312
[3]
Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: Effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy [J].
Brodoefel, H. ;
Reimann, A. ;
Burgstahler, C. ;
Schumacher, F. ;
Herberts, T. ;
Tsiflikas, I. ;
Schroeder, S. ;
Claussen, C. D. ;
Kopp, A. F. ;
Heuschmid, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 66 (01) :134-141
[4]
Budoff MJ, 2006, CLIN CARDIOL, V29, P4
[5]
Diagnostic Performance of 64-Multidetector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Individuals Without Known Coronary Artery Disease [J].
Budoff, Matthew J. ;
Dowe, David ;
Jollis, James G. ;
Gitter, Michael ;
Sutherland, John ;
Halamert, Edward ;
Scherer, Markus ;
Bellinger, Raye ;
Martin, Arthur ;
Benton, Robert ;
Delago, Augustin ;
Min, James K. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (21) :1724-1732
[6]
Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography - A scientific statement from the American Heart Association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention, council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology [J].
Budoff, Matthew J. ;
Achenbach, Stephan ;
Blumenthal, Roger S. ;
Carr, J. Jeffrey ;
Goldin, Jonathan G. ;
Greenland, Philip ;
Guerci, Alan D. ;
Lima, Joao A. C. ;
Rader, Daniel J. ;
Rubin, Geoffrey D. ;
Shaw, Leslee J. ;
Wiegers, Susan E. .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (16) :1761-1791
[7]
Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography [J].
Budoff, MJ ;
Achenbach, S ;
Duerinckx, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (11) :1867-1878
[8]
Cademartiri F, 2005, Minerva Cardioangiol, V53, P465
[9]
DOWE D, 2007, LOW DOSE QUADRUPLE R, P22
[10]
Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: Improved image quality and reduced radiation dose [J].
Earls, James P. ;
Berman, Elise L. ;
Urban, Bruce A. ;
Curry, Charlene A. ;
Lane, Judith L. ;
Jennings, Robert S. ;
McCulloch, Colin C. ;
Hsieh, Jiang ;
Londt, John H. .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 246 (03) :742-753