Bone density monitoring with the total hip site

被引:19
作者
Leslie, WD
Ward, LM
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Med, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Radiol, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[3] St Boniface Gen Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
关键词
osteoporosis; bone density; precision; monitoring; quality assurance;
D O I
10.1385/JCD:7:3:269
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Serial measurement of bone density is important in the clinical management of osteoporosis because it helps to confirm therapeutic response and identify individuals who continue to lose bone density. The lumbar spine is often stated to be the preferred site for monitoring purposes, but much of the supporting information derives from the relatively poor precision of the femoral neck, which is known to be less reproducible than the total hip. The Manitoba Bone Density Program delivers clinical services to the Province of Manitoba, Canada and maintains a detailed quality assurance program. We compared lumbar spine and total hip reproducibility using a pencil-beam scanner (n = 82), a fan-beam scanner (n = 92), and a cross-calibration between the two scanners (n = 61). Each comparison showed significantly lower measurement error at the total hip than at the lumbar spine (p < 0.001). We assessed the likelihood that follow-up measurements would show an absolute difference exceeding the least significant change in routine clinical practice (n = 2412 paired examinations). The total hip measurement detected change more frequently than the lumbar spine in each of these comparisons. In summary, we believe that the total hip site has been undervalued for monitoring purposes and might actually be the preferred site in older individuals with a high prevalence of lumbar spine artifact.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Replacing DXA scanners: Cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading [J].
Blake, GM .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 59 (01) :1-5
[2]   A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: A comparison with posteroanterior spine, hip and total-body DXA [J].
Blake, GM ;
Herd, RJM ;
Fogelman, I .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 6 (06) :462-470
[3]   Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies:: Quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions [J].
Bolotin, HH ;
Sievänen, H ;
Grashuis, JL .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2003, 18 (06) :1020-1027
[4]  
Brown JP, 2002, CAN MED ASSOC J, V167, pS1
[5]   Predicting subsequent bone density response to intermittent cyclical therapy with etidronate from initial density response in patients with osteoporosis [J].
Crilly, RG ;
Sebaldt, RJ ;
Hodsman, AB ;
Adachi, JD ;
Brown, JP ;
Goldsmith, CH ;
Hanley, DA ;
Olszynski, WO ;
Ste-Marie, LG ;
Stephenson, GF .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 (07) :607-614
[6]   QUALITY-CONTROL OF DXA INSTRUMENTS IN MULTICENTER TRIALS [J].
FAULKNER, KG ;
MCCLUNG, MR .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :218-227
[7]   Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques [J].
Glüer, CC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1999, 14 (11) :1952-1962
[8]   ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION ERRORS - HOW TO MEASURE THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF BONE DENSITOMETRY TECHNIQUES [J].
GLUER, CC ;
BLAKE, G ;
LU, Y ;
BLUNT, BA ;
JERGAS, M ;
GENANT, HK .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :262-270
[9]   BONE-MINERAL DENSITY IN HEALTHY NORMAL WOMEN AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF MEASUREMENTS IN SPINE AND HIP USING DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
HADDAWAY, MJ ;
DAVIE, MWJ ;
MCCALL, IW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1992, 65 (771) :213-217
[10]   Precision error of fan-beam dual X-ray absorptiometry scans at spine, hip, and forearm [J].
Henzell, S ;
Dhaliwal, S ;
Pontifex, R ;
Gill, F ;
Price, R ;
Retallack, R ;
Prince, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2000, 3 (04) :359-364