Effects of event probability and sequence on children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity, reading, and math disorder

被引:15
作者
Klorman, R
Thatcher, JE
Shaywitz, SE
Fletcher, JM
Marchione, KE
Holahan, JM
Stuebing, KK
Shaywitz, BA
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; reading disorder; math disorder; oppositional/defiant disorder; event-related potentials; reaction time;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01415-4
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: We investigated the impact of stimulus probability and sequence on performance and event-related potentials of 310 children classified into 12 combinations of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (Not-attention -deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Inattentive and Combined subtypes) with presence/absence of reading disorder and math disorder. Methods: Subjects pressed buttons to displays of the letters O and X, which were presented with probabilities of either.17/.83 or .50/50. Greater response selection was required in the .17/.83 condition. Results: Stimulus probability had comparable effects on all diagnostic groups. The extent of mismatch between a stimulus and preceding events elicited less systematic increases in errors, P3b latency, and P3b amplitude among both attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder subtypes than controls. Mismatch with preceding trials more greatly reduced math disorder and reading disorder + math disorder children's speed in the Rare task and accuracy in both conditions. Math disorder and reading disorder + math disorder subjects also registered less the effects of alternations of the infrequent O on N2 amplitude and on P3b latency. Conclusions: Math disorder and reading disorder + math disorder youngsters' lower sensitivity to sequence irregularity in their event-related potentials along with greater disruption of performance suggest working memory deficits that adversely affected response selection. Comorbidity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reading disorder did not affect the results. (C) 2002 Society of Biological Psychiatry.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 804
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   EFFORTFUL PROCESSING DEFICITS IN CHILDREN WITH READING AND OR ATTENTION DISORDERS [J].
ACKERMAN, PT ;
ANHALT, JM ;
DYKMAN, RA ;
HOLCOMB, PJ .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1986, 5 (01) :22-40
[2]   COMORBIDITY OF ADHD AND READING-DISABILITY AMONG CLINIC-REFERRED CHILDREN [J].
AUGUST, GJ ;
GARFINKEL, BD .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 18 (01) :29-45
[3]  
Barkley R.A., 1997, ADHD and the nature of self-control
[4]   THE RESPONSE OF AGGRESSIVE AND NONAGGRESSIVE ADHD CHILDREN TO 2 DOSES OF METHYLPHENIDATE [J].
BARKLEY, RA ;
MCMURRAY, MB ;
EDELBROCK, CS ;
ROBBINS, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 28 (06) :873-881
[5]   COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT DISORDER WITH AND WITHOUT HYPERACTIVITY AS DEFINED BY RESEARCH CRITERIA [J].
BARKLEY, RA ;
DUPAUL, GJ ;
MCMURRAY, MB .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 58 (06) :775-789
[6]   S-R RELATIONSHIPS AND REACTION-TIMES TO NEW VERSUS REPEATED SIGNALS IN A SERIAL TASK [J].
BERTELSON, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 65 (05) :478-+
[7]  
CNATWELL DP, 1992, ATTENTION DEFICIT DI, P145
[8]  
COOK EW, 1981, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V24, P726
[9]   LEARNING-DISORDERED CHILDRENS EVOKED-POTENTIALS DURING SUSTAINED ATTENTION [J].
DAINER, KB ;
KLORMAN, R ;
SALZMAN, LF ;
HESS, DW ;
DAVIDSON, PW ;
MICHAEL, RL .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 9 (01) :79-94
[10]  
Douglas V.I., 1999, HDB DISRUPTIVE BEHAV, P105, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4615-4881-2_5, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-4881-2_5]