An evaluation of the Extended Barthel Index with acute ischemic stroke patients

被引:20
作者
Jansa, J
Pogacnik, T
Gompertz, P
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Ctr Med, Dept Neurol, Ljubljana 1525, Slovenia
[2] Royal London Hosp, Dept Hlth Care Elderly, London, England
关键词
stroke; ADL; assessment; Extended Barthel Index;
D O I
10.1177/0888439003262287
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the Extended Barthel index with acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods. This prospective 1- to 6-week poststroke follow-up study was carried out using 33 newly diagnosed acute ischemic stroke patients who were admitted to the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Department of Neurology. Measures used were Barthel Index (BI), Extended Barthel Index (FBI), Fugl Meyer Motor Impairment Scale, 1-5 Self-assessment scale, Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Results. The EBI is a reliable scale in terms of internal consistency, The cognitve part is less reliable than the physical part of the EBI. It is a 3-dimensional scale as calculated by factor analysis (factor 1 with eigenvalue 8.2, factor 2 with eigenvalue 2.7 and factor 3 with eigenvalue 0.9). Criterion validity to the BI and and the Fugl-Meyer Motor Impairment scale was supported (P = 0.1-0.001). External validity to the Self-Assessnient scale was also supported (P < 0.001). It is more sensitive to the changes in functional status that occur in the 1st 6 weeks poststroke than the original BI, although the ceiling effect was not really explained in this follow-up period. Conclusion. The EBI is a valid, reliable, 2- to 3-dimensional outcome measure of disability/activity for stroke patients. To some extent, it also reveals the level of patients' perception of their functional status.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 41
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   The American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification [J].
Kelly-Hayes, M ;
Robertson, JT ;
Broderick, JP ;
Duncan, PW ;
Hershey, LA ;
Roth, EJ ;
Thies, WH ;
Trombly, CA .
STROKE, 1998, 29 (06) :1274-1280
[12]  
KIDD D, 1995, DISABIL REHABIL, V17, P53
[13]  
MAHONEY F I, 1965, Md State Med J, V14, P61
[14]  
Marolf M., 1996, Clin. Rehabil., V10, P309
[15]   The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review [J].
Ottenbacher, KJ ;
Hsu, YW ;
Granger, CV ;
Fiedler, RC .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (12) :1226-1232
[16]  
PROSIEGEL M, 1996, NEUROL REHABIL, V1, P7
[17]  
PROSIEGEL M, 1997, PROBLEM ORIENTED APP, P21
[18]  
*STATS INC, 1995, STAT WIND 5 0 COMP P
[19]   The functional independence measure: Tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories [J].
Stineman, MG ;
Shea, JA ;
Jette, A ;
Tassoni, CJ ;
Ottenbacher, KJ ;
Fiedler, R ;
Granger, CV .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (11) :1101-1108
[20]  
Wade D T, 1988, Int Disabil Stud, V10, P64