Grand challenges for high-speed rail environmental assessment in the United States

被引:28
作者
Chester, Mikhail V. [1 ]
Ryerson, Megan S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Affiliate Fac, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
High-speed rail; Aviation; Environmental assessment; Energy; Climate change; CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT; DECISION-ANALYSIS; MARKET SHARE; LIGHT RAIL; LAND-USE; TRANSPORTATION; AIR; COMPETITION; AIRCRAFT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The comprehensiveness of environmental assessments of future long-distance travel that include high-speed rail (HSR) are constrained by several methodological, institutional, and knowledge gaps that must and can be addressed. These gaps preclude a robust understanding of the changes in environmental, human health, resource, and climate change impacts that result from the implementation of HSR in the United States. The gaps are also inimical to an understanding of how HSR can be positioned for 21st century sustainability goals. Through a synthesis of environmental studies, the gaps are grouped into five over-arching grand challenges. They include a spatial incompatibility between HSR and other long-distance modes that is often ignored, an environmental review process that obviates modal alternatives, siloed interest in particular environmental impacts, a dearth of data on future vehicle and energy sources, and a poor understanding of secondary impacts, particularly in land use. Recommendations are developed for institutional investment in multimodal research, knowledge and method building around several topics. Ultimately, the environmental assessment of HSR should be integrated in assessments that seek to understand the complementary and competitive configurations of transportation services, as well as future accessibility. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 26
页数:12
相关论文
共 72 条
[21]   High-speed rail with emerging automobiles and aircraft can reduce environmental impacts in California's future [J].
Chester, Mikhail ;
Horvath, Arpad .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 7 (03)
[22]   Integrating Life-cycle Environmental and Economic Assessment with Transportation and Land Use Planning [J].
Chester, Mikhail V. ;
Nahik, Matthew J. ;
Fraser, Andrew M. ;
Kimball, Mindy A. ;
Garikapati, Venu M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (21) :12020-12028
[23]   Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains [J].
Chester, Mikhail V. ;
Horvath, Arpad .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 4 (02)
[24]  
Daganzo C. F., 2005, Logistics Systems Analysis
[25]  
Economist, 2013, EC TECHNOLOGY Q 0601, P7
[26]  
Electric Power Research Institute, 2011, TRANSP EL TECHN OV
[27]  
Federal Aviation Administration, 2012, AV GREENH GAS EM RED
[28]   Environmental Benefits from Mode Substitution: Comparison of the Environmental Impact from Aircraft and High-Speed Train Operations [J].
Givoni, Moshe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION, 2007, 1 (04) :209-230
[29]  
Gleave Steer Davies, 2006, AIR RAIL COMP COMP F
[30]   Spatial and Temporal Capitalization Effects of Light Rail in Phoenix: From Conception, Planning, and Construction to Operation [J].
Golub, Aaron ;
Guhathakurta, Subhrajit ;
Sollapuram, Bharath .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2012, 32 (04) :415-429