A theoretical comparison of the pressure dependence of the threshold current of phosphorus-, aluminium- and nitrogen-based 1.3 μm lasers

被引:15
作者
Gönül, B [1 ]
Oduncuoglu, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Gaziantep Univ, Dept Engn Phys, TR-27310 Gaziantep, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0268-1242/19/1/004
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A comparative study of the three competing laser materials, InGaAsP-InP. AlGaInAs-InP and InGaAsN-GaAs, has been undertaken, for the first time, involving threshold characteristics with pressure. In our theoretical study we investigate the factors that influence the material gain performance, the threshold characteristics and the pressure dependence of each of the laser systems. We find that AlGaInAs and InGaAsN active layer materials have substantially better material gain performance than the commonly used InGaAsP at room temperature. Both radiative and non-radiative current contributions for laser systems are compared using basic equations, which makes our analysis particularly attractive owing to its simplicity and ability to predict the main effects involved. We have found that the estimated variation of phonon-assisted Auger rates with pressure in the N-based system has a slower decrease than that of the other two laser systems. The threshold carrier density nth in the N-based system increases with pressure whereas it decreases in Al- and P-based laser systems. This opposite variation changes the overall behaviour of the threshold current in these three competing laser systems. Our theoretical calculations indicate a significant increase of the radiative to non-radiative recombination current in the N-based laser system. This result highlights the intrinsic superiority of the N-based laser system.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 32
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
ADAMS AR, BAND STRUCTURE ENG S, P279
[2]  
Adams MJ., 1981, An Introduction to Optical Waveguides
[3]   HIGH-POWER CONVERSION EFFICIENCY IN A STRAINED INGAAS/ALGAAS QUANTUM WELL LASER [J].
BOUR, DP ;
EVANS, GA ;
GILBERT, DB .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1989, 65 (09) :3340-3343
[4]  
Buyanova IA, 2001, MRS INTERNET J N S R, V6
[5]  
CASEY HC, HETEROSTRUCTURE LASE, P197
[6]   THE CASE FOR AUGER RECOMBINATION IN IN1-XGAXASYP1-Y [J].
DUTTA, NK ;
NELSON, RJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1982, 53 (01) :74-92
[7]  
Ebeling K. J., 1993, Integrated Optoelectronics: Waveguide Optics, Photonics, Semiconductors
[8]  
FEHSE R, 2003, ELECTRON LETT, V37, P325
[9]  
GHITI A, 1987, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V861, P96
[10]  
Gönül B, 2003, SEMICOND SCI TECH, V18, P163, DOI 10.1088/0268-1242/18/2/318