Users guide to the orthopaedic literature: How to use a systematic literature review

被引:29
作者
Bhandari, M
Guyatt, GH
Montori, V
Devereaux, PJ
Kowski, MFS
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2106/00004623-200209000-00024
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Investigators who perform a systematic review address a focused clinical question, conduct a thorough search of the literature, apply inclusion and exclusion criteria to each potentially eligible study, critically appraise the relevant studies, conduct sensitivity analyses, and synthesize the information to draw conclusions relevant to patient care or additional study. A meta-analysis is a quantitative (or statistical) pooling of results across eligible studies with the aim of increasing the precision of the final estimates by increasing the sample size. The current increase in the number of small randomized trials in orthopaedic surgery provides a strong argument in favor of meta-analysis; however, the quality of the primary studies included ultimately reflects the quality of the pooled data from a meta-analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1672 / 1682
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Health Care Decisions
[2]   Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials [J].
Assmann, SF ;
Pocock, SJ ;
Enos, LE ;
Kasten, LE .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9209) :1064-1069
[3]   Reamed versus nonreamed intramedullary nailing of lower extremity long bone fractures: A systematic overview and meta-analysis [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Tong, D ;
Adili, A ;
Shaughnessy, SG .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2000, 14 (01) :2-9
[4]   Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery - A systematic review of their methodologies [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Morrow, F ;
Kulkarni, AV ;
Tornetta, P .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (01) :15-24
[5]  
BRESLOW NE, 1980, IARC SCI PUBL, V32, P136
[6]   Assessing the quality of randomized trials:: Reliability of the Jadad scale [J].
Clark, HD ;
Wells, GA ;
Huët, C ;
McAlister, FA ;
Salmi, LR ;
Fergusson, D ;
Laupacis, A .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1999, 20 (05) :448-452
[7]   Statistical correctness [J].
Colton, C .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2000, 14 (08) :527-528
[8]   METHODOLOGIC GUIDELINES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS IN HEALTH-CARE FROM THE POTSDAM CONSULTATION ON METAANALYSIS [J].
COOK, DJ ;
SACKETT, DL ;
SPITZER, WO .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (01) :167-171
[9]   STATISTICAL VERSUS TRADITIONAL PROCEDURES FOR SUMMARIZING RESEARCH FINDINGS [J].
COOPER, HM ;
ROSENTHAL, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1980, 87 (03) :442-449
[10]   INCORPORATING VARIATIONS IN THE QUALITY OF INDIVIDUAL RANDOMIZED TRIALS INTO METAANALYSIS [J].
DETSKY, AS ;
NAYLOR, CD ;
OROURKE, K ;
MCGEER, AJ ;
LABBE, KA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (03) :255-265