Selection of comparison criteria and experimental conditions to evaluate the kinetic performance of monolithic and packed-bed columns

被引:38
作者
Eeltink, Sebastiaan
Gzil, Piotr
Kok, Wim Th.
Schoenmakers, Peter J.
Desmet, Gert
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Dept Chem Engn, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Polymer Analyt Grp, Vant Hoff Inst Mol Sci, NL-1018 WV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
kinetic plots; column characterization; LC supports;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.068
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The present study concerns the problem of finding appropriate experimental conditions and comparison criteria to assess the kinetic performance of LC supports with different sizes or morphologies. A general procedure, based on evaluating each support for its own optimal mobile-phase composition, is proposed. The practical elaboration of the procedure is illustrated using the specific case of a capillary LC separation of a series of polycyclic aromatic test compounds employing silica-monolith capillary columns and capillary columns packed with 6-mu m porous particles. To compare the systems for their ability to yield the fastest critical-pair separation, plate-height measurements are transformed into an effective plate number kinetic plot, i.e., a plot of the extrapolated retention time divided by the square of the extrapolated effective plate number (t(R)/N-eff(2)) versus N-eff. This type of data representation provides a direct and universal basis to compare the kinetic performance of different LC supports and it corrects for differences in retention strength arising from different phase ratios. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 114
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Silica-based monoliths for capillary electrochromatography: Methods of fabrication and their applications in analytical separations [J].
Allen, D ;
El Rassi, Z .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 2003, 24 (22-23) :3962-3976
[2]   A first principles explanation for the experimentally observed increase in A-term band broadening in small domain silica monoliths and other chromatographic supports [J].
Billen, J ;
Gzil, P ;
Baron, GV ;
Desmet, G .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2005, 1077 (01) :28-36
[3]  
Cazes J., 2002, CHROMATOGRAPHY THEOR
[4]  
Desmet G, 2005, LC GC EUR, V18, P403
[5]   Geometry-independent plate height representation methods for the direct comparison of the kinetic performance of LC supports with a different size or morphology [J].
Desmet, G ;
Clicq, D ;
Gzil, P .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 77 (13) :4058-4070
[6]   Performance limits of monolithic and packed capillary columns in high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrochromatography [J].
Eeltink, S ;
Desmet, G ;
Vivó-Truyols, G ;
Rozing, GP ;
Schoenmakers, PJ ;
Kok, WT .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2006, 1104 (1-2) :256-262
[7]   Comparison of the efficiency of microparticulate and monolithic capillary columns [J].
Eeltink, S ;
Decrop, WMC ;
Rozing, GP ;
Schoenmakers, PJ ;
Kok, WT .
JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2004, 27 (17-18) :1431-1440
[8]   Study of the influence of the aspect ratio on efficiency, flow resistance and retention factors of packed capillary columns in pressure- and electrically-driven liquid chromatography [J].
Eeltink, S ;
Rozing, GP ;
Schoenmakers, PJ ;
Kok, WT .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2004, 1044 (1-2) :311-316
[9]  
Giddings J.C., 1965, DYNAMICS CHROMATOGRA
[10]   LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY COLUMN DESIGN [J].
KATZ, E ;
OGAN, KL ;
SCOTT, RPW .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1984, 289 (APR) :65-83