Tibiofemoral contact areas and pressures in six high flexion knees

被引:47
作者
Shiramizu, Kei [1 ]
Vizesi, Frank [1 ]
Bruce, Warwick [1 ]
Herrmann, Sebastian [1 ]
Walsh, William R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Prince Wales Hosp, Surg & Orthopaed Res Labs, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
关键词
STRESS-DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION; IMPLANT DESIGN; ARTHROPLASTY; RANGE; MOTION; POLYETHYLENE; JOINT;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-007-0478-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
The tibiofemoral articulating interfaces of six high flexion knee designs were examined using a standard testing protocol developed by Harris et al. [J Biomech 32:951-958 (1999)] to investigate the polyethylene insert contact areas and pressures. A load of 3600 N was applied for 10 s at 0, 30, 60, 90, 110, 135 and 155A degrees of flexion. Contact areas and pressures at the femoral-polyethylene insert interface were measured with a I-scan 4000 system. Up to 110A degrees of flexion, the VANGUARD RP HI-FLEX showed the highest contact area and lowest pressure. At the deep flexion angles, contact area decreased and contact pressure increased significantly in all knees. The NexGen series showed a constant contact area throughout the various flexion angles. In general, all high flexion knees could result in almost point contact in an extremely high range of motion.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 406
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
A STUDY OF LOWER-LIMB MECHANICS DURING STAIR-CLIMBING [J].
ANDRIACCHI, TP ;
ANDERSSON, GBJ ;
FERMIER, RW ;
STERN, D ;
GALANTE, JO .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1980, 62 (05) :749-757
[2]
Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties [J].
Banks, S ;
Bellemans, J ;
Nozaki, H ;
Whiteside, LA ;
Harman, M ;
Hodge, WA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (410) :131-138
[3]
In vitro assessment of proximal polyethylene contact surface areas and stresses in mobile bearing knees [J].
Chapman-Sheath, PJ ;
Bruce, WJM ;
Chung, WK ;
Morberg, P ;
Gillies, RM ;
Walsh, WR .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2003, 25 (06) :437-443
[4]
COLLIER JP, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V273, P232
[5]
Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty - The effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions [J].
Dennis, DA ;
Komistek, RD ;
Stiehl, JB ;
Walker, SA ;
Dennis, KN .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (07) :748-752
[6]
An improved method for measuring tibiofemoral contact areas in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of K-scan sensor and Fuji film [J].
Harris, ML ;
Morberg, P ;
Bruce, WJM ;
Walsh, WR .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (09) :951-958
[7]
Kinematics of the knee joint in deep flexion: a radiographic assessment [J].
Hefzy, MS ;
Kelly, BP ;
Cooke, TDV .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 1998, 20 (04) :302-307
[8]
KIM JM, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P177
[9]
Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis [J].
Lizaur, A ;
Marco, L ;
Cebrian, R .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (04) :626-629
[10]
THE EFFECTS OF IMPLANT DESIGN ON RANGE OF MOTION AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY - TOTAL CONDYLAR VERSUS POSTERIOR STABILIZED TOTAL CONDYLAR DESIGNS [J].
MALONEY, WJ ;
SCHURMAN, DJ .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1992, (278) :147-152