Phase II study of capecitabine (Xeloda®) and concomitant boost radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

被引:92
作者
Krishnan, Sunil
Janjan, Nora A.
Skibber, John M.
Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A.
Wolff, Robert A.
Das, Prajnan
Delclos, Marc E.
Chang, George J.
Hoff, Paulo M.
Eng, Cathy
Brown, Thomas D.
Crane, Christopher H.
Feig, Barry W.
Morris, Jeffrey
Vadhan-Raj, Saroj
Hamilton, Stanley R.
Lin, Edward H.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Cytokine Therapy & Support Care, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX USA
[6] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2006年 / 66卷 / 03期
关键词
rectal cancer; neoadjuvant chemoradiation; capecitabine;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.063
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of capecitabine (Xeloda (R)), an oral fluoropyrimidine, as a radiosensitizer in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods and Materials: We conducted a phase II study of capecitabine (825 mg/m(2) orally, twice daily continuous) with radiotherapy (52.5 Gy/30 fractions to the primary tumor and perirectal nodes) in 54 patients with LARC (node-negative >= T3 or any node-positive tumor) staged by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The primary endpoint was pathologic response rate; secondary endpoints included toxicity profiles and survival parameters. Results: Of the 54 patients (median age, 56.7 years; range, 21.3-78.7 years; male:female ratio, 1.7; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1: 100%), 51 patients (94%) had T3N0 or T3N1 disease by EUS. Surgery was not performed in 3 patients; 2 of these patients had metastatic disease, and the third patient refused after a complete clinical response. Of the 51 patients evaluable for pathologic response, 9 patients (18%) achieved complete response, and 12 patients (24%) had microscopic residual disease (< 10% viable cells). In addition, 26 patients of all 54 patients (51%) achieved T-downstaging, and 15 patients of 29 patients (52%) achieved N-downstaging. Grade 3/4 toxicities were radiation dermatitis (9%) and diarrhea (2%). Sphincter preservation rate for tumor <= 5 cm from the anal verge was 67% (18/27). Conclusion: This regimen of radiotherapy plus capecitabine is well tolerated and is more convenient than protracted venous infusion of 5-FU. The pathologic response rate is comparable to our previous experience using protracted venous infusion 5-FU for LARC. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / 771
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, NEW ENGL J MED, V312, P1465
[2]   Enhanced tumorocidal effect of chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Preliminary results - EORTC 22921 [J].
Bosset, JF ;
Calais, G ;
Mineur, L ;
Maingon, P ;
Radosevic-Jelic, L ;
Daban, A ;
Bardet, E ;
Beny, A ;
Briffaux, A ;
Collette, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (24) :5620-5627
[3]   Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer -: A meta-analysis [J].
Cammà, C ;
Giunta, M ;
Fiorica, F ;
Pagliaro, L ;
Craxì, A ;
Cottone, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (08) :1008-1015
[4]   First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer:: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin [J].
Cassidy, J ;
Twelves, C ;
Van Cutsem, E ;
Hoff, P ;
Bajetta, E ;
Boyer, M ;
Bugat, R ;
Burger, U ;
Garin, A ;
Graeven, U ;
McKendrick, J ;
Maroun, J ;
Marshall, J ;
Osterwalder, B ;
Pérez-Manga, G ;
Rosso, R ;
Rougier, P ;
Schilsky, RL .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) :566-575
[5]   The addition of continuous infusion 5-FU to preoperative radiation therapy increases tumor response, leading to increased sphincter preservation in locally advanced rectal cancer [J].
Crane, CH ;
Skibber, JM ;
Birnbaum, EH ;
Feig, BW ;
Singh, AK ;
Delclos, ME ;
Lin, EH ;
Fleshman, JW ;
Thames, HD ;
Kodner, IJ ;
Lockett, MA ;
Picus, J ;
Phan, T ;
Chandra, A ;
Janjan, NA ;
Read, TE ;
Myerson, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (01) :84-89
[6]   Increased toxicity with gefitinib, capecitabine, and radiation therapy in pancreatic and rectal cancer: Phase I trial results [J].
Czito, BG ;
Willett, CG ;
Bendell, JC ;
Morse, MA ;
Tyler, DS ;
Fernando, NH ;
Mantyh, CR ;
Blobe, GC ;
Honeycutt, W ;
Yu, DH ;
Clary, BM ;
Pappas, TN ;
Ludwig, KA ;
Hurwitz, HI .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (04) :656-662
[7]   Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with capecitabine versus infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for locally advanced rectal cancer: A matched pair analysis [J].
Das, P ;
Lin, EH ;
Bhatia, S ;
Skibber, JM ;
Rodriguez-Bigas, MA ;
Feig, BW ;
Hoff, PM ;
Eng, C ;
Wolff, RA ;
Krishnan, S ;
Janjan, NA ;
Crane, CH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02) :S164-S164
[8]   Capecitabine in combination with preoperative radiation therapy in locally advanced, resectable, rectal cancer:: a multicentric phase II study [J].
De Paoli, A ;
Chiara, S ;
Luppi, G ;
Friso, ML ;
Beretta, GD ;
Del Prete, S ;
Pasetto, L ;
Santantonio, M ;
Sarti, E ;
Mantello, G ;
Innocente, R ;
Frustaci, S ;
Corvò, R ;
Rosso, R .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (02) :246-251
[9]   Phase I trial evaluating the concurrent combination of radiotherapy and capecitabine in rectal cancer [J].
Dunst, J ;
Reese, T ;
Sutter, T ;
Zühlke, H ;
Hinke, A ;
Kölling-Schlebusch, K ;
Frings, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (19) :3983-3991
[10]   Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy [J].
Dworak, O ;
Keilholz, L ;
Hoffmann, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1997, 12 (01) :19-23