A survey of some pre-analytical errors identified from the Biochemistry Department of a Scottish hospital

被引:11
作者
Davidson, D. Fraser [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Crosshouse, Dept Biochem, Kilmarnock KA2 0BE, Scotland
关键词
Phlebotomy; in vitro haemolysis; EDTA contamination; training; EDTA CONTAMINATION; BLOOD SPECIMENS; PHLEBOTOMY; HYPERKALEMIA; HYPOCALCEMIA; MEDICINE; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1177/0036933014529056
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: It is estimated that 70% of all health care decisions affecting diagnosis or treatment involve laboratory testing. The pre-analytical phase of the testing process shows the highest prevalence of errors accounting for 70% of all mistakes in laboratory diagnostics. It is recommended that laboratories collect statistics on pre-analytical error rates. This survey examined some mistakes in blood collection, i.e. specimen haemolysis, and EDTA contamination. Methods: Survey was from June 2011 to May 2012. Haemolysis was detected by analysers' automated haemolysis index function. Plasma EDTA was measured by an automated system. Data were captured from our laboratory information management system. Results: For a total workload of 763,577 blood specimens, the overall haemolysis rate was 3.2%. Much higher rates of both specimen haemolysis and EDTA contamination were observed when blood was not collected by trained phlebotomists. Conclusions: Better training in blood collection, achieving the standard of professional phlebotomists, will improve validity of diagnostic information; reduce risks of dangerous misinterpretation of results, unwanted anaemia and needle-stick injury and decrease laboratory supplies costs. This type of audit could be replicated in other Scottish Health Boards with some benefit and thereby better target future training needs.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 94
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BMJ
[2]   Variation in phlebotomy techniques in emergency medicine and the incidence of haemolysed samples [J].
Berg, J. E. ;
Ahee, P. ;
Berg, J. D. .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 48 :562-565
[3]  
CALAM RR, 1982, CLIN CHEM, V28, P1399
[4]   Errors in a stat laboratory: Types and frequencies 10 years later [J].
Carraro, Paolo ;
Plebani, Mario .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 53 (07) :1338-1342
[5]   Spurious hyperkalaemia due to EDTA contamination: common and not always easy to identify [J].
Comes, Michael P. ;
Ford, Clare ;
Gama, Rousseau .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 45 :601-603
[6]  
Cornes MP, 2010, CLIN LAB, V56, P597
[7]   Potassium EDTA contamination of blood samples: a warning [J].
Crook, M. A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 63 (08) :1127-1127
[8]   EDTA analysis on the Roche MODULAR® analyser [J].
Davidson, D. F. .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2007, 44 :294-296
[9]   Effects of contamination of blood specimens with liquid potassium-EDTA anticoagulant [J].
Davidson, DF .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 39 :273-280
[10]   SPURIOUS INCREASE IN PLASMA POTASSIUM CONCENTRATION AND REDUCTION IN PLASMA CALCIUM DUE TO INVITRO CONTAMINATION WITH LIQUID POTASSIUM EDETIC ACID AT PHLEBOTOMY [J].
FITZPATRICK, MF ;
NEWELL, J ;
GRIMES, H ;
EGAN, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1987, 40 (05) :588-588