The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research

被引:1184
作者
Lai, Edwin J. [1 ]
Calderwood, Audrey H. [1 ]
Doros, Gheorghe [2 ]
Fix, Oren K. [3 ]
Jacobson, Brian C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Med Ctr, Gastroenterol Sect, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Div Gastroenterol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
ELECTROLYTE LAVAGE SOLUTION; SODIUM-PHOSPHATE; PREPARATION QUALITY; MAGNESIUM CITRATE; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; AGREEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: Few bowel-preparation rating scales have been validated. Most scales were intended for comparing oral purgatives and fail to account for washing and/or suctioning by the endoscopist. This limits their utility in studies of colonoscopy outcomes, such as polyp-detection rates. Objective: To develop a valid and reliable scale for use in colonoscopy outcomes research. Setting: Academic medical center. Methods: We developed the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), a 10-point scale that assesses bowel preparation after all cleansing maneuvers are completed by the endoscopist. We assessed interobserver and intraobserver reliability by using video footage of colonoscopies viewed on 2 separate occasions by 22 clinicians. We then applied the BBPS prospectively during screening colonoscopies and compared BBPS scores with clinically meaningful outcomes, including polyp-detection rates and procedure times. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient (a measure of interobserver reliability) for BBPS scores was 0.74. The weighted kappa (a measure of intraobserver reliability) for scores was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66-0.87). During 633 screening colonoscopies, the mean (SD) BBPS score was 6.0 +/- 1.6. Higher BBPS scores (>= 5 vs < 5) were associated with,I higher polyp-detection rate (40% vs 24%, P < .02). BBPS scores were inversely correlated with colonoscope insertion (r = -0.16, P < .003) and withdrawal (r = -0.23, P < .001) times. Limitations: Single-center study. Conclusions: The BBPS is a valid and reliable measure of bowel preparation. It may be well suited to colonoscopy outcomes research because it reflects the colon's cleanliness during the inspection phase of the procedure. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:620-5.)
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 625
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING A NEW SODIUM PHOSPHATE-BISACODYL REGIMEN WITH CONVENTIONAL PEG-ES LAVAGE FOR OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION [J].
AFRIDI, SA ;
BARTHEL, JS ;
KING, PD ;
PINEDA, JJ ;
MARSHALL, JB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (05) :485-489
[2]
Agresti A., 1990, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA
[3]
Aronchick C., 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P2667
[4]
A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[5]
Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings [J].
Barnhart, HX ;
Song, JL ;
Haber, MJ .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (09) :1371-1384
[6]
Low-volume oral colonoscopy bowel preparation: sodium phosphate and magnesium citrate [J].
Berkelhammer, C ;
Ekambaram, A ;
Silva, RG .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (01) :89-94
[7]
Enhancing the quality of colonoscopy: the importance of bowel purgatives [J].
Burke, Carol A. ;
Church, James M. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 66 (03) :565-573
[8]
Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective comparison [J].
Clarkston, WK ;
Tsen, TN ;
Dies, DF ;
Schratz, CL ;
Vaswani, SK ;
Bjerregaard, P .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (01) :42-48
[9]
EQUIVALENCE OF WEIGHTED KAPPA AND INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AS MEASURES OF RELIABILITY [J].
FLEISS, JL ;
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1973, 33 (03) :613-619
[10]
Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Wietlisbach, V ;
Gonvers, JJ ;
Burnand, B ;
Vader, JP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) :378-384