Computed tomography dose assessment for a 160 mm wide, 320 detector row, cone beam CT scanner

被引:65
作者
Geleijns, J. [1 ]
Artells, M. Salvado [2 ]
Bruin, P. Wde [1 ]
Matter, R. [3 ]
Muramatsu, Y. [4 ]
McNitt-Gray, M. F. [5 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, E-43201 Reus, Spain
[3] Toshiba America Med Syst Inc, Tustin, CA 92780 USA
[4] Natl Saitama Hosp, Dept Radiol, Wako, Saitama, Japan
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Thorac Imaging Res Grp, Dept Radiol Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
DOSIMETRY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/54/10/012
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学];
摘要
Computed tomography (CT) dosimetry should be adapted to the rapid developments in CT technology. Recently a 160 mm wide, 320 detector row, cone beam CT scanner that challenges the existing Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) dosimetry paradigm was introduced. The purpose of this study was to assess dosimetric characteristics of this cone beam scanner, to study the appropriateness of existing CT dose metrics and to suggest a pragmatic approach for CT dosimetry for cone beam scanners. Dose measurements with a small Farmer-type ionization chamber and with 100 mm and 300 mm long pencil ionization chambers were performed free in air to characterize the cone beam. According to the most common dose metric in CT, namely CTDI, measurements were also performed in 150 mm and 350 mm long CT head and CT body dose phantoms with 100 mm and 300 mm long pencil ionization chambers, respectively. To explore effects that cannot be measured with ionization chambers, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of the dose distribution in 150 mm, 350 mm and 700 mm long CT head and CT body phantoms were performed. To overcome inconsistencies in the definition of CTDI(100) for the 160 mm wide cone beam CT scanner, doses were also expressed as the average absorbed dose within the pencil chamber ((D) over bar (100)). Measurements free in air revealed excellent correspondence between CTDI(300air) and (D) over bar (100air), while CTDI(100air) substantially underestimates CTDI(300air). Results of measurements in CT dose phantoms and corresponding MC simulations at centre and peripheral positions were weighted and revealed good agreement between CTDI(300w), D(100w) and CTDI(600w), while CTDI(100w) substantially underestimates CTDI(300w) (D) over bar (100w) provides a pragmatic metric for characterizing the dose of the 160 mm wide cone beam CT scanner. This quantity can be measured with the widely available 100 mm pencil ionization chamber within 150 mm long CT dose phantoms. CTDI(300w) measured in 350 mm long CT dose phantoms serves as an appropriate standard of reference for characterizing the dose of this CT scanner. A CT dose descriptor that is based on an integration length smaller than the actual beam width is preferably expressed as an (average) dose, such as (D) over bar (100) for the 160 mm wide cone beam CT scanner, and not as CTDI(100).
引用
收藏
页码:3141 / 3159
页数:19
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices [J].
Bauhs, John A. ;
Vrieze, Thomas J. ;
Primak, Andrew N. ;
Bruesewitz, Michael R. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (01) :245-253
[2]
Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography [J].
Deak, Paul ;
van Straten, Marcel ;
Shrimpton, Paul C. ;
Zankl, Maria ;
Kalender, Willi A. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (04) :759-772
[3]
Dewey Marc, 2008, Eur Heart J, V29, P1669, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm626
[4]
Experimental validation of a versatile system of CT dosimetry using a conventional ion chamber:: Beyond CTDI100 [J].
Dixon, Robert L. ;
Ballard, Adam C. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (08) :3399-3413
[5]
*FDA, 2006, GUID IND FDA STAFF 3
[6]
The calibration of experimental self-developing Gafchromic® HXR film for the measurement of radiation dose in computed tomography [J].
Gorny, KR ;
Leitzen, SL ;
Bruesewitz, MR ;
Kofler, JM ;
Hangiandreou, NJ ;
McCollough, CH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (04) :1010-1016
[7]
Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT [J].
Huda, Walter ;
Ogden, Kent M. ;
Khorasani, Mohammad R. .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (03) :995-1003
[8]
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 2002, INT STANDARD MEDICAL
[9]
Calculation of computed tomography dose index to effective dose conversion factors based on measurement of the dose profile along the fan shaped beam [J].
Jansen, JTM ;
Geleijns, J ;
Zweers, D ;
Schultz, FW ;
Zoetelief, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (817) :33-41
[10]
Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography [J].
Jessen, KA ;
Shrimpton, PC ;
Geleijns, J ;
Panzer, W ;
Tosi, G .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 1999, 50 (01) :165-172