Quality assurance of a helical tomotherapy machine

被引:96
作者
Fenwick, JD
Tomé, WA
Jaradat, HA
Hui, SK
James, JA
Balog, JP
DeSouza, CN
Lucas, DB
Olivera, GH
Mackie, TR
Paliwal, BR
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Human Oncol, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Phys Med, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Tomotherapy Inc, Madison, WI 53717 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/49/13/012
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Helical tomotherapy has been developed at the University of Wisconsin, and 'Hi-Art II' clinical machines are now commercially manufactured. At the core of each machine lies a ring-gantry-mounted short linear accelerator which generates x-rays that are collimated into a fan beam of intensity-modulated radiation by a binary multileaf, the modulation being variable with gantry angle. Patients are treated lying on a couch which is translated continuously through the bore of the machine as the gantry rotates. Highly conformal dose-distributions can be delivered using this technique, which is the therapy equivalent of spiral computed tomography. The approach requires synchrony of gantry rotation, couch translation, accelerator pulsing and the opening and closing of the leaves of the binary multileaf collimator used to modulate the radiation beam. In the course of clinically implementing helical tomotherapy, we have developed a quality assurance (QA) system for our machine. The system is analogous to that recommended for conventional clinical linear accelerator QA by AAPM Task Group 40 but contains some novel components, reflecting differences between the Hi-Art devices and conventional clinical accelerators. Here the design and dosimetric characteristics of Hi-Art machines are summarized and the QA system is set out along with experimental details of its implementation. Connections between this machine-based QA work, pre-treatment patient-specific delivery QA and fraction-by-fraction dose verification are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2933 / 2953
页数:21
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Clinical helical tomotherapy commissioning dosimetry [J].
Balog, J ;
Olivera, G ;
Kapatoes, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (12) :3097-3106
[2]   Benchmarking beam alignment for a clinical helical tomotherapy device [J].
Balog, J ;
Mackie, TR ;
Pearson, D ;
Hui, S ;
Paliwal, B ;
Jeraj, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) :1118-1127
[3]   Multileaf collimator interleaf transmission [J].
Balog, JP ;
Mackie, TR ;
Wenman, DL ;
Glass, M ;
Fang, G ;
Pearson, D .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (02) :176-186
[4]   Characterization of the output for helical delivery of intensity modulated slit beams [J].
Balog, JP ;
Mackie, TR ;
Reckwerdt, P ;
Glass, M ;
Angelos, L .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (01) :55-64
[5]   MONTE-CARLO STUDY OF ACCELERATOR HEAD SCATTER [J].
CHANEY, EL ;
CULLIP, TJ ;
GABRIEL, TA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (09) :1383-1390
[6]  
Deasy J. O., 2001, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, V51, P400, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02561-5
[7]  
FENWICK JD, 2004, UNPUB PHYS MED BIOL
[8]  
*IEC, 1996, 1217 IEC
[9]   PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE-CHARACTERISTICS OF SPIRAL CT SCANNING [J].
KALENDER, WA ;
POLACIN, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (05) :910-915
[10]   On the verification of the incident energy fluence in tomotherapy IMRT [J].
Kapatoes, JM ;
Olivera, GH ;
Ruchala, KJ ;
Mackie, TR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (11) :2953-2965