193nm CD shrinkage under SEM: modeling the mechanism

被引:41
作者
Habermas, A [1 ]
Hong, DS [1 ]
Ross, M [1 ]
Livesay, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Cypress Semicond Inc, Bloomington, MN 55425 USA
来源
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XVI, PTS 1 & 2 | 2002年 / 4689卷
关键词
SEM; electron; 193nm photoresist; shrinkage; linewidth slimming;
D O I
10.1117/12.473436
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
As photolithography platforms move from 248nm to 193nm resist systems, the industry's established dimension measurement technique (CD-SEM) causes significant shrink-age of the resist structures during measurement. Many studies have been done to characterize this effect and look for the factors that influence / reduce this shrink-age. While numerous anecdotal mechanisms have been proposed to explain the shrink-age, few theoretical / empirical equations have been proposed to connect the observed effects to fundamental mechanisms. Models are proposed relating physical properties (accelerating voltage, photoresist density, resist e-beam film shrink-age) to the commonly observed CD 'hammer test' shrinkage profiles. The validity of the model assumptions is tested via Monte Carlo simulations, FITR, e-beam curing, SPM and ellipsometry. These models explain the shape of the CD response to repeated measurements (exponential decay curve) and the magnitude of the shrinkage. These models also offer insight into why lower accelerating voltages cause reduced CD shrinkage, although the models predict that accelerating voltage should be a much more dominant parameter for CD shrink-age than literature has shown to date. Mass loss and density changes were also characterized during e-beam cure to check the validity of the model assumptions.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 101
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
HOFFMANN T, 2001, YIELD MANAGEMENT SOL, V3, P32
[2]  
JOY DC, DATABASE ELECT SOLID
[3]   Investigation of electron beam stabilization of 193nm photoresists [J].
Kim, MS ;
Park, JW ;
Kim, HJ ;
Jun, BJ ;
Gil, MG ;
Kim, BH ;
Ross, M ;
Livesay, W .
ADVANCES IN RESIST TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESSING XVIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2001, 4345 :737-750
[4]   CD changes of 193 nm resists during SEM measurement [J].
Kudo, T ;
Bae, JB ;
Dammel, RR ;
Kim, WK ;
McKenzie, D ;
Rahman, MD ;
Padmanaban, M ;
Ng, W .
ADVANCES IN RESIST TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESSING XVIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2001, 4345 :179-189
[5]   Modification of 193nm(ArF) photoresists by electron beam stabilization [J].
Martens, P ;
Yamamoto, S ;
Edamatsu, K ;
Uetani, Y ;
Pain, L ;
Palla, R ;
Ross, M ;
Livesay, W .
ADVANCES IN RESIST TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESSING XVIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2001, 4345 :138-149
[6]   Advanced metal lift-off process using electron beam flood exposure of single layer photoresist [J].
Minter, J ;
Ross, M ;
Livesay, WR ;
Wong, S ;
Narcy, M ;
Marlowe, T .
MICROLITHOGRAPHY 1999: ADVANCES IN RESIST TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESSING XVI, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3678 :1074-1082
[7]  
NEISSER M, 2000, P INT 2000, P43
[8]  
PAIN L, 2000, P INT 2000, P233
[9]   193nm Metrology: facing severe e-beam/resist interaction phenomena [J].
Vasconi, M ;
Bollin, M ;
Cotti, G ;
Pain, L ;
Tirard, V .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XV, 2001, 4344 :653-661
[10]  
WU J, 2001, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V4345, P190