In vitro comparison of the effects of rough and polished stem surface finish on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty

被引:3
作者
Bartlett, Gavin E. [1 ]
Beard, David J. [1 ]
Murray, David W. [1 ,2 ]
Gill, Harinderjit S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Surg, OOEC, Oxford, England
[2] Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford, England
关键词
PERIPROSTHETIC OSTEOLYSIS; FEMORAL COMPONENTS; REPLACEMENT; PARTICLES; DISEASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3109/17453670902876755
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background and purpose High pressures around implants can cause bone lysis and loosening. We investigated how pressures are generated around cemented femoral stems. Method We compared the pressures generated by rough and polished tapered stems at their cement interfaces, in an in vitro model, before and after 1 million load cycles. Results At the start of the study, the loading of both polished and rough stems generated interface pressures that were not statistically significantly different. After 1 million load cycles, the rough stems generated greater interface pressures than at the start (p = 0.03), with maximum pressure wave amplitudes of 450,000 Pa or 3,375 mm Hg. The pressures generated by polished stems were similar before and after 1 million load cycles, and were lower than the pressures generated by the rough stems (p = 0.01). Stem loading caused micromotion between the stem and cement. Polished stems migrated distally in the cement but retained rotational and axial stability. The rough stems also migrated distally and wore the cement mantle, leading to increased rotational instability. Interpretation The change in the rotational micromotion of the rough stem is likely to be the principal cause of the increased stem pump output and to be a key factor in the longevity of cemented femoral implants.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 149
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
Cement migration after THR -: A comparison of Charnley Elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA [J].
Alfaro-Adrián, J ;
Gill, HS ;
Murray, DW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (01) :130-134
[2]
ANTHONY PP, 1990, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V72, P6
[3]
Fluid pressure may cause periprosthetic osteolysis - Particles are not the only thing [J].
Aspenberg, P ;
van der Vis, H .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 69 (01) :1-4
[4]
The femoral stem pump in cemented hip arthroplasty: An in vitro model [J].
Bartlett, G. E. ;
Beard, D. J. ;
Murray, D. W. ;
Gill, H. S. .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2008, 30 (08) :1042-1048
[5]
HIP-JOINT LOADING DURING WALKING AND RUNNING, MEASURED IN 2 PATIENTS [J].
BERGMANN, G ;
GRAICHEN, F ;
ROHLMANN, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1993, 26 (08) :969-990
[6]
Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities [J].
Bergmann, G ;
Deuretzbacher, G ;
Heller, M ;
Graichen, F ;
Rohlmann, A ;
Strauss, J ;
Duda, GN .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 34 (07) :859-871
[7]
Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry [J].
Collis, DK ;
Mohler, CG .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (04) :586-592
[8]
Fluid flow around model femoral components of differing surface finishes - In vitro investigations [J].
Crawford, RW ;
Evans, M ;
Ling, RS ;
Murray, DW .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 70 (06) :589-595
[9]
Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty - A two-year study [J].
Glyn-Jones, S ;
Gill, HS ;
McLardy-Smith, P ;
Murray, DW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (02) :172-176
[10]
OSTEOLYSIS AND PARTICLE DISEASE IN HIP-REPLACEMENT - A REVIEW [J].
HARRIS, WH .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 65 (01) :113-123