Prospective evaluation of concomitant lymphadenectomy in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Preliminary analysis of outcomes

被引:18
作者
Atug, Fatih
Castle, Erik P.
Srivastav, Sudesh K.
Burgess, Scott V.
Thomas, Raju
Davis, Rodney
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Urol, Ctr Minimally Invas Urol Surg, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Dept Biostat, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2006.20.514
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Lymph-node staging is important in many patients with prostate cancer, as it influences adjuvant treatment and prognosis. However, lymphadenectomy adds to the operating time, cost, and potential for complications. Herein, we compared the effects of concomitant lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients and Methods: Data were collected prospectively on 145 consecutive RARPs. Patients were evaluated in two groups. Group I was patients who underwent RARP and concomitant lymphadenectomy (LAD)(N = 40), and group II consisted of patients who underwent RARP only (N = 105). Operative time (OT), length of hospital stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), cost, and complications were compared in the two groups. Results: The mean number of lymph nodes removed per patient in group I was 14.08 (range 9-24). Lymphnode metastases were detected in 2 (5%) of the patients. There were no statistically significant differences in LOS, EBL, OT, operative charges, or hospital charges in the two groups. However, the mean OT increased 9.3% when LAD was performed. At a mean follow-up of 14.8 months (range 3-32 months), 16 complications had been observed in the entire series of patients (11.03%). According to the Clavien system, there were eight grade I complications, seven grade II complications, and one grade III, complication. Four complications occurred in group I (10%) and 12 in group II (11.4%). There were no lymphoceles or deep venous thromboses (DVTs) in group I. Cost analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: There was no significant impact of concomitant lymphadenectomy on LOS, EBL, charges, or complications when RARP was performed. Although the difference was not statistically significant, the OT will be slightly longer, as an additional procedure is being performed.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 518
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: Impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Allaf, ME ;
Palapattu, GS ;
Trock, BJ ;
Carter, HB ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (05) :1840-1844
[2]   Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (03) :849-854
[3]   ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR PEROPERATIVE FROZEN-SECTION ANALYSIS OF PELVIC LYMPH-NODES DURING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY [J].
BANGMA, CH ;
HOP, WCJ ;
SCHRODER, FH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 76 (05) :595-599
[4]   PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY CAN BE OMITTED IN SELECTED PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - DEVELOPMENT OF A SYSTEM OF PATIENT SELECTION [J].
BISHOFF, JT ;
REYES, A ;
THOMPSON, IM ;
HARRIS, MJ ;
STCLAIR, SR ;
GOMELLA, L ;
BUTZIN, CA .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) :270-274
[5]   ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR BILATERAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN SELECT PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
BLUESTEIN, DL ;
BOSTWICK, DG ;
BERGSTRALH, EJ ;
OESTERLING, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1315-1320
[6]   Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Clark, T ;
Parekh, DJ ;
Cookson, MS ;
Chang, SS ;
Smith, ER ;
Wells, N ;
Smith, JA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (01) :145-147
[7]  
CLAVIEN PA, 1992, SURGERY, V111, P518
[8]   Evaluation of staging lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer [J].
El-Galley, RES ;
Keane, TE ;
Petros, JA ;
Sanders, WH ;
Clarke, HS ;
Cotsonis, GA ;
Graham, SD .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (04) :663-667
[9]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF LYMPH NODAL METASTASES IN PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
GERVASI, LA ;
MATA, J ;
EASLEY, JD ;
WILBANKS, JH ;
SEALEHAWKINS, C ;
CARLTON, CE ;
SCARDINO, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (02) :332-336
[10]   Robotic assisted, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in humans [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
Cappèle, O ;
Martinez, JB ;
Navarra, S ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (04) :1078-1081