Combined magnetic resonance urography and targeted helical CT in patients with renal colic: A new approach to reduce delivered dose

被引:10
作者
Blandino, A
Minutoli, F
Scribano, E
Vinci, S
Magno, C
Pergolizzi, S
Settineri, N
Pandolfo, I
Gaeta, M
机构
[1] Univ Messina, Policlin G Martino, Dept Radiol Sci, I-98125 Messina, Italy
[2] Univ Messina, Policlin G Martino, Dept Urol, I-98125 Messina, Italy
关键词
renal colic; MR; CT; MR urography; absorbed dose; urinary stone;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20109
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether magnetic resonance urography (MRU), obtained before helical computed tomography (CT) in patients with acute renal colic, can help delimit the obstructed area to be subsequently examined by a targeted CT scan, thus reducing the dose of radiation. Materials and Methods: Patients (51) with symptoms of acute renal colic underwent MRU and a total urinary tract helical CT. CT images from the 5 cm below the level of ureteral obstruction as demonstrated by MRU were selected out. Combined interpretation of MRU and selected CT images constituted protocol A. Protocol B consisted of the entire unenhanced helical CT of the urinary tract. The two protocols were compared regarding the following points: 1) sensitivity in diagnosing the presence of obstructing urinary stones, and 2) the delivered radiation dose. Results: Protocol A and protocol B had, respectively, 98% and 100% sensitivity in demonstrating ureteral stone as a cause of renal colic. Estimated average dose calculated from phantom study was 0.52 mSv for protocol A and 2.83 mSv for protocol B. Therefore, the effective radiation dose was 5.4 times lower in protocol A compared to protocol B. Conclusion: Combined MRU and short helical CT has a high sensitivity in detecting ureteral calculi with a reduced radiation dose.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 271
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Imaging bowel obstruction: A comparison between fast magnetic resonance imaging and helical computed tomography [J].
Beall, DP ;
Fortman, BJ ;
Lawler, BC ;
Regan, F .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 57 (08) :719-724
[2]  
BERGMAN A, 2000, EUR RADIOL, V10, P360
[3]  
Blandino A, 2001, ACTA RADIOL, V42, P532
[4]   Acute ureterolithiasis: Nonenhanced helical CT findings of perinephric edema for prediction of degree of ureteral obstruction [J].
Boridy, IC ;
Kawashima, A ;
Goldman, SM ;
Sandler, CM .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (03) :663-667
[5]   Ureteral calculi: Diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients [J].
Boulay, I ;
Holtz, P ;
Foley, WD ;
White, B ;
Begun, FP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) :1485-1490
[6]   Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[7]   Suspected ureteral colic: Primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography [J].
Catalano, O ;
Nunziata, A ;
Altei, F ;
Siani, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (02) :379-387
[8]  
*CEC, 1999, EUR GUID QUAL CRIT C
[9]   Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic [J].
Chen, MYM ;
Zagoria, RJ ;
Saunders, HS ;
Dyer, RB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (06) :1447-1450
[10]   Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT [J].
Coll, DM ;
Varanelli, MJ ;
Smith, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (01) :101-103