The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities

被引:519
作者
Grant, P. M. [1 ]
Ryan, C. G. [1 ]
Tigbe, W. W. [1 ]
Granat, M. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bjsm.2006.030262
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate measurement of physical activity patterns can be used to identify sedentary behaviour and may facilitate interventions aimed at reducing inactivity. Objective: To evaluate the activPAL physical activity monitor as a measure of posture and motion in everyday activities using observational analysis as the criterion standard. Methods: Wearing three activPAL monitors, 10 healthy participants performed a range of randomly assigned everyday tasks incorporating walking, standing and sitting. Each trial was captured on a digital camera and the recordings were synchronised with the activPAL. The time spent in different postures was visually classified and this was compared with the activPAL output. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2,1) for interdevice reliability ranged from 0.79 to 0.99. Using the Bland and Altman method, the mean percentage difference between the activPAL monitor and observation for total time spent sitting was 0.19% (limits of agreement -0.68% to 1.06%) and for total time spent upright was -0.27% (limits of agreement -1.38% to 0.84%). The mean difference for total time spent standing was 1.4% (limits of agreement -6.2% to 9.1%) and for total time spent walking was -2.0% ( limits of agreement -16.1% to 12.1%). A second-by-second analysis between observer and monitor found an overall agreement of 95.9%. Conclusion: The activPAL activity monitor is a valid and reliable measure of posture and motion during everyday physical activities.
引用
收藏
页码:992 / 997
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
American College Sports Medicine, 2006, ACSMS GUID EX TEST P
[2]   Physical activity monitoring based on accelerometry: validation and comparison with video observation [J].
Aminian, K ;
Robert, P ;
Buchser, EE ;
Rutschmann, B ;
Hayoz, D ;
Depairon, M .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1999, 37 (03) :304-308
[3]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[4]   Waging war on modern chronic diseases: primary prevention through exercise biology [J].
Booth, FW ;
Gordon, SE ;
Carlson, CJ ;
Hamilton, MT .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 88 (02) :774-787
[5]   Validity and reliability of measurements obtained with an "activity monitor" in people with and without a transtibial amputation [J].
Bussmann, HBJ ;
Reuvekamp, PJ ;
Veltink, PH ;
Martens, WLJ ;
Stam, HJ .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1998, 78 (09) :989-998
[6]   Quantification of physical activities by means of ambulatory accelerometry: A validation study [J].
Bussmann, JBJ ;
Tulen, JHM ;
van Herel, ECG ;
Stam, HJ .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 35 (05) :488-496
[7]   Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation study [J].
Bussmann, JBJ ;
van de Laar, YM ;
Neeleman, MP ;
Stam, HJ .
PAIN, 1998, 74 (2-3) :153-161
[8]   Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The activity monitor [J].
Bussmann, JBJ ;
Martens, WLJ ;
Tulen, JHM ;
Schasfoort, FC ;
van den Berg-Emons, HJG ;
Stam, HJ .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2001, 33 (03) :349-356
[9]  
Chakravarthy MV, 2002, MAYO CLIN PROC, V77, P165
[10]   Detection of posture and motion by accelerometry: a validation study in ambulatory monitoring [J].
Foerster, F ;
Smeja, M ;
Fahrenberg, J .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1999, 15 (05) :571-583