Targeted KRAS Mutation Assessment on Patient Tumor Histologic Material in Real Time Diagnostics

被引:74
作者
Kotoula, Vassiliki
Charalambous, Elpida
Biesmans, Bart
Malousi, Andigoni
Vrettou, Eleni
Fountzilas, George
Karkavelas, George
机构
[1] Department of Pathology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki
[2] Department of Medical Informatics, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki
[3] Department of Medical Oncology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki
[4] Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven
来源
PLOS ONE | 2009年 / 4卷 / 11期
关键词
METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER; PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED TISSUES; K-RAS MUTATIONS; BREAST-CANCER; DNA PROBES; EGFR; CETUXIMAB; PCR; ASSAYS; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0007746
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Testing for tumor specific mutations on routine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues may predict response to treatment in Medical Oncology and has already entered diagnostics, with KRAS mutation assessment as a paradigm. The highly sensitive real time PCR (Q-PCR) methods developed for this purpose are usually standardized under optimal template conditions. In routine diagnostics, however, suboptimal templates pose the challenge. Herein, we addressed the applicability of sequencing and two Q-PCR methods on prospectively assessed diagnostic cases for KRAS mutations. Methodology/Principal Findings: Tumor FFPE-DNA from 135 diagnostic and 75 low-quality control samples was obtained upon macrodissection, tested for fragmentation and assessed for KRAS mutations with dideoxy-sequencing and with two QPCR methods (Taqman-minor-groove-binder [TMGB] probes and DxS-KRAS-IVD). Samples with relatively well preserved DNA could be accurately analyzed with sequencing, while Q-PCR methods yielded informative results even in cases with very fragmented DNA (p<0.0001) with 100% sensitivity and specificity vs each other. However, Q-PCR efficiency (Ct values) also depended on DNA-fragmentation (p<0.0001). Q-PCR methods were sensitive to detect <= 1% mutant cells, provided that samples yielded cycle thresholds (Ct) <29, but this condition was met in only 38.5% of diagnostic samples. In comparison, FFPE samples (>99%) could accurately be analyzed at a sensitivity level of 10% (external validation of TMGB results). DNA quality and tumor cell content were the main reasons for discrepant sequencing/Q-PCR results (1.5%). Conclusions/Significance: Diagnostic targeted mutation assessment on FFPE-DNA is very efficient with Q-PCR methods in comparison to dideoxy-sequencing. However, DNA fragmentation/amplification capacity and tumor DNA content must be considered for the interpretation of Q-PCR results in order to provide accurate information for clinical decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[31]   3′-minor groove binder-DNA probes increase sequence specificity at PCR extension temperatures [J].
Kutyavin, IV ;
Afonina, IA ;
Mills, A ;
Gorn, VV ;
Lukhtanov, EA ;
Belousov, ES ;
Singer, MJ ;
Walburger, DK ;
Lokhov, SG ;
Gall, AA ;
Dempcy, R ;
Reed, MW ;
Meyer, RB ;
Hedgpeth, J .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (02) :655-661
[32]   DNA genotyping of unbuffered formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues [J].
Legrand, B ;
de Mazancourt, P ;
Durigon, M ;
Khalifat, V ;
Crainic, K .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 125 (2-3) :205-211
[33]   Evaluation of the performance of LNA and MGB probes in 5′-nuclease PCR assays [J].
Letertre, C ;
Perelle, S ;
Dilasser, F ;
Arar, K ;
Fach, P .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 2003, 17 (06) :307-311
[34]   KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer [J].
Lièvre, A ;
Bachet, JB ;
Le Corre, D ;
Boige, V ;
Landi, B ;
Emile, JF ;
Côté, JF ;
Tomasic, G ;
Penna, C ;
Ducreux, M ;
Rougier, P ;
Penault-Llorca, F ;
Laurent-Puig, P .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 66 (08) :3992-3995
[35]   KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab [J].
Lievre, Astrid ;
Bachet, Jean-Baptiste ;
Boige, Valerie ;
Cayre, Anne ;
Le Corre, Delphine ;
Buc, Emmanuel ;
Ychou, Marc ;
Bouche, Olivier ;
Landi, Bruno ;
Louvet, Christophe ;
Andre, Thierry ;
Bibeau, Frederic ;
Diebold, Marie-Daniele ;
Rougier, Philippe ;
Ducreux, Michel ;
Tomasic, Gorana ;
Emile, Jean-Francois ;
Penault-Llorca, Frederique ;
Laurent-Puig, Pierre .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (03) :374-379
[36]   An alternative approach to determining therapeutic choices in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): Maximizing the diagnostic procedure and the use of low-volume lung biopsies [J].
Lim, Elaine H. ;
Zhang, Shen-Li ;
Yu, Kun ;
Nga, Min-En ;
Ahmed, Dokeu A. ;
Agasthian, Thirugananam ;
Wong, Poo-Sing ;
Chua, Gim-Chuah ;
Wong, Daniel ;
Tan, Lenny ;
Seto, Kar-Yin ;
Yap, Wee-See ;
Low, Seow-Ping ;
Khoo, Kay-Leong ;
Chang, Alex ;
Ng, Alan ;
Tan, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 2 (05) :387-396
[37]  
Marchetti A, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V354, P526
[38]   Targeting EGFR in colorectal cancer [J].
Messersmith, Wells A. ;
Ahnen, Dennis J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (17) :1834-1836
[39]   Genotyping of triallelic SNPs using TaqMan® PCR [J].
Morita, Akihiko ;
Nakayama, Tomohiro ;
Doba, Nobutaka ;
Hinohara, Shigeaki ;
Mizutani, Tomohiko ;
Soma, Masayoshi .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 2007, 21 (03) :171-176
[40]   Mutation Detection by Real-Time PCR: A Simple, Robust and Highly Selective Method [J].
Morlan, John ;
Baker, Joffre ;
Sinicropi, Dominick .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (02)