Targeted KRAS Mutation Assessment on Patient Tumor Histologic Material in Real Time Diagnostics

被引:74
作者
Kotoula, Vassiliki
Charalambous, Elpida
Biesmans, Bart
Malousi, Andigoni
Vrettou, Eleni
Fountzilas, George
Karkavelas, George
机构
[1] Department of Pathology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki
[2] Department of Medical Informatics, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki
[3] Department of Medical Oncology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki
[4] Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven
来源
PLOS ONE | 2009年 / 4卷 / 11期
关键词
METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER; PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED TISSUES; K-RAS MUTATIONS; BREAST-CANCER; DNA PROBES; EGFR; CETUXIMAB; PCR; ASSAYS; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0007746
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Testing for tumor specific mutations on routine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues may predict response to treatment in Medical Oncology and has already entered diagnostics, with KRAS mutation assessment as a paradigm. The highly sensitive real time PCR (Q-PCR) methods developed for this purpose are usually standardized under optimal template conditions. In routine diagnostics, however, suboptimal templates pose the challenge. Herein, we addressed the applicability of sequencing and two Q-PCR methods on prospectively assessed diagnostic cases for KRAS mutations. Methodology/Principal Findings: Tumor FFPE-DNA from 135 diagnostic and 75 low-quality control samples was obtained upon macrodissection, tested for fragmentation and assessed for KRAS mutations with dideoxy-sequencing and with two QPCR methods (Taqman-minor-groove-binder [TMGB] probes and DxS-KRAS-IVD). Samples with relatively well preserved DNA could be accurately analyzed with sequencing, while Q-PCR methods yielded informative results even in cases with very fragmented DNA (p<0.0001) with 100% sensitivity and specificity vs each other. However, Q-PCR efficiency (Ct values) also depended on DNA-fragmentation (p<0.0001). Q-PCR methods were sensitive to detect <= 1% mutant cells, provided that samples yielded cycle thresholds (Ct) <29, but this condition was met in only 38.5% of diagnostic samples. In comparison, FFPE samples (>99%) could accurately be analyzed at a sensitivity level of 10% (external validation of TMGB results). DNA quality and tumor cell content were the main reasons for discrepant sequencing/Q-PCR results (1.5%). Conclusions/Significance: Diagnostic targeted mutation assessment on FFPE-DNA is very efficient with Q-PCR methods in comparison to dideoxy-sequencing. However, DNA fragmentation/amplification capacity and tumor DNA content must be considered for the interpretation of Q-PCR results in order to provide accurate information for clinical decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[51]   Cancer: The Road to Amiens [J].
Stewart, David J. ;
Kurzrock, Razelle .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (03) :328-333
[52]   Chemotherapy, Bevacizumab, and Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [J].
Tol, Jolien ;
Koopman, Miriam ;
Cats, Annemieke ;
Rodenburg, Cees J. ;
Creemers, Geert J. M. ;
Schrama, Jolanda G. ;
Erdkamp, Frans L. G. ;
Vos, Allert H. ;
van Groeningen, Cees J. ;
Sinnige, Harm A. M. ;
Richel, Dirk J. ;
Voest, Emile E. ;
Dijkstra, Jeroen R. ;
Vink-Borger, Marianne E. ;
Antonini, Ninja F. ;
Mol, Linda ;
van Krieken, Johan H. J. M. ;
Dalesio, Otilia ;
Punt, Cornelis J. A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (06) :563-572
[53]   Design and standardization of PCR primers and protocols for detection of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations in suspect lymphoproliferations:: Report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4-CT98-3936 [J].
van Dongen, JJM ;
Langerak, AW ;
Brüggemann, M ;
Evans, PAS ;
Hummel, M ;
Lavender, FL ;
Delabesse, E ;
Davi, F ;
Schuuring, E ;
García-Sanz, R ;
van Krieken, JHJM ;
Droese, J ;
González, D ;
Bastard, C ;
White, HE ;
Spaargaren, M ;
González, M ;
Parreira, A ;
Smith, JL ;
Morgan, GJ ;
Kneba, M ;
Macintyre, EA .
LEUKEMIA, 2003, 17 (12) :2257-2317
[54]   KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program [J].
van Krieken, J. H. J. M. ;
Jung, A. ;
Kirchner, T. ;
Carneiro, F. ;
Seruca, R. ;
Bosman, F. T. ;
Quirke, P. ;
Flejou, J. F. ;
Hansen, T. Plato ;
de Hertogh, G. ;
Jares, P. ;
Langner, C. ;
Hoefler, G. ;
Ligtenberg, M. ;
Tiniakos, D. ;
Tejpar, S. ;
Bevilacqua, G. ;
Ensari, A. .
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2008, 453 (05) :417-431
[55]   Determinants of RNA Quality from FFPE Samples [J].
von Ahlfen, Silke ;
Missel, Andreas ;
Bendrat, Klaus ;
Schlumpberger, Martin .
PLOS ONE, 2007, 2 (12)
[56]   DNA degradation test predicts success in whole-genome amplification from diverse clinical samples [J].
Wang, Fengfei ;
Wang, Lilin ;
Briggs, Christine ;
Sicinska, Ewa ;
Gaston, Sandra M. ;
Mamon, Harvey ;
Kulke, Matthew H. ;
Zamponi, Raffaella ;
Loda, Massimo ;
Maher, Elizabeth ;
Ogino, Shuji ;
Fuchs, Charles S. ;
Li, Jin ;
Hader, Carlos ;
Makrigiorgos, G. Mike .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2007, 9 (04) :441-451
[57]   Role of KRAS and EGFR as biomarkers of response to erlotinib in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study BR.21 [J].
Zhu, Chang-Qi ;
Santos, Gilda da Cunha ;
Ding, Keyue ;
Sakurada, Akira ;
Cutz, Jean-Claude ;
Liu, Ni ;
Zhang, Tong ;
Marrano, Paula ;
Whitehead, Marlo ;
Squire, Jeremy A. ;
Kamel-Reid, Suzanne ;
Seymour, Lesley ;
Shepherd, Frances A. ;
Tsao, Ming-Sound .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (26) :4268-4275