Optimization of sensitivity and noise in piezoresistive cantilevers

被引:117
作者
Yu, XM
Thaysen, J
Hansen, O
Boisen, A
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Mikroelektron Centret, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Peking Univ, Inst Microelect, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.1493660
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this article, the sensitivity and the noise of piezoresistive cantilevers were systematically investigated with respect to the piezoresistor geometry, the piezoresistive materials, the doping dose, the annealing temperature, and the operating biased voltage. With the noise optimization results, dimension optimized array cantilevers were designed and fabricated by using single-crystal silicon, low-pressure chemical-vapor deposition (LPCVD) amorphous silicon and microcrystalline silicon as piezoresistive layers. Measurement results have shown that the smallest Hooge factor (alpha) was 3.2x10(-6), the biggest gauge factors was 95, and the minimum detectable deflection (MDD) at 6 V and 200 Hz-measurement bandwidth was 0.3 nm for a single-crystal silicon cantilever. Of the two LPCVD silicon piezoresistive cantilevers, amorphous silicon piezoresistors had relatively lower 1/f noise. The MDD for a LPCVD silicon cantilever at a 200 Hz-measurement bandwidth was 0.4 nm. For all kinds of piezoresistive cantilevers, the 1/f noises were decreased by 35%-50% and the gauge factors were decreased by 60-70% if the doping dose were increased by ten times. The annealing at 1050 degreesC for 30 min decreased 1/f noise by about 65% compared with the 950 degreesC for 10 min treatments. The cantilevers with a relatively higher-doping dose gave smaller MDD even though the gauge factors of them were decreased by nearly a factor of 1.8. The higher-biased voltages had no great improvements on the MDD due to the 1/f noise dominance. (C) 2002 American Institute of Physics.
引用
收藏
页码:6296 / 6301
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] BENJAMIN W, 1996, SOLID STATE SENSOR A, P219
  • [2] ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPE
    BINNIG, G
    QUATE, CF
    GERBER, C
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1986, 56 (09) : 930 - 933
  • [3] BINNIG G, 1982, HELV PHYS ACTA, V55, P726
  • [4] 1/f noise in polycrystalline SiGe analyzed in terms of mobility fluctuations
    Chen, XY
    Salm, C
    Hooge, FN
    Woerlee, PH
    [J]. SOLID-STATE ELECTRONICS, 1999, 43 (09) : 1715 - 1724
  • [5] DEGAAFF H, 1982, J APPL PHYS, V54, P2504
  • [6] AFM with piezoresistive Wheatstone bridge cantilever - Noise performances and applications in contact and noncontact mode
    Gotszalk, T
    Linnemann, R
    Rangelow, IW
    Dumania, P
    Grabiec, P
    [J]. METAL/NONMETAL MICROSYSTEMS: PHYSICS, TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS, 1996, 2780 : 376 - 379
  • [7] 1/F noise considerations for the design and process optimization of piezoresistive cantilevers
    Harley, JA
    Kenny, TW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 2000, 9 (02) : 226 - 235
  • [8] EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON 1-F NOISE
    HOOGE, FN
    KLEINPENNING, TGM
    VANDAMME, LKJ
    [J]. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 1981, 44 (05) : 479 - 532
  • [9] 1/F NOISE SOURCES
    HOOGE, FN
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 1994, 41 (11) : 1926 - 1935
  • [10] 1/F NOISE IS NO SURFACE EFFECT
    HOOGE, FN
    [J]. PHYSICS LETTERS A, 1969, A 29 (03) : 139 - &