What Defines Us as Professionals in the Field of Risk Analysis?

被引:5
作者
Aven, Terje [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
SAFETY SCIENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/risa.12680
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In a recent issue of Risk Analysis, the then-President of the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA), Pamela Williams, has some interesting reflections about the risk analysis field. She states that the ability and desire to tackle difficult problems using a risk analytical approach is what uniquely defines us as professionals in the field of risk analysis. The point of departure for her discussion is interviews with the plenary speakers of the 2014 SRA Annual Meeting, who addressed two divisive topics: hydraulic fracking and marijuana use. She points to several themes that invite contributions from the field of risk analysis, including: Has the full spectrum of potential risks and benefits been identified and weighted, and what are the risk tradeoffs or countervailing risks? Inspired by Williams's reflections, and by analyzing the issues raised in the interviews, this article seeks to clarify what our field is really providing. A main conclusion of the article is that it is essential to acknowledge that professionals in the field of risk analysis merely support the tackling of such problems, and that their genuine competencethat which distinguishes them from other professionalslies in the risk analytical approach itself.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 860
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FDN RISK ANAL
[2]   Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Zio, Enrico .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (07) :1164-1172
[3]   What is safety science? [J].
Aven, Terje .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 67 :15-20
[4]   The Role of Quantitative Risk Assessments for Characterizing Risk and Uncertainty and Delineating Appropriate Risk Management Options, with Special Emphasis on Terrorism Risk [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Renn, Ortwin .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (04) :587-600
[5]   Foundations of safety science: A postscript [J].
Hale, Andrew .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 67 :64-69
[6]   Is Risk Analysis Scientific? [J].
Hansson, Sven Ove ;
Aven, Terje .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (07) :1173-1183
[7]  
Hansson SvenOve., 2013, Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem
[8]   Is safety a subject for science? [J].
Hollnagel, Erik .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 67 :21-24
[9]   Issues in safety science [J].
Hopkins, Andrew .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 67 :6-14
[10]   The foundations of safety science [J].
Le Coze, Jean-Christophe ;
Pettersen, Kenneth ;
Reiman, Teemu .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 67 :1-5