Progress in tailoring adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

被引:6
作者
Bedard, Philippe L. [1 ,2 ]
Piccart-Gebhart, Martine J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Jules Bordet, Dept Med Oncol, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Breast Int Grp, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
aromatase inhibitors; biomarkers; breast cancer; pharamacogenetics; tamoxifen; treatment tailoring; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; AROMATASE INHIBITORS; TAMOXIFEN TREATMENT; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; RECEPTOR STATUS; HOT FLASHES; HER2; STATUS; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1097/CCO.0b013e32832fc8b0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose of review Clinical trials have shown that a variety of aromatase inhibitor strategies modestly reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence over 5 years of tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with endocrine-sensitive disease. This review will discuss the use of predictive biomarkers to tailor postmenopausal endocrine therapy. Recent findings In spite of early promise, recent studies suggest that quantitative evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 expression do not identify a subgroup of patients with differential benefit from an aromatase inhibitor over tamoxifen therapy. Estrogen receptor-positive tumors with increased proliferation, evaluated by Ki-67, may be selectively responsive to aromatase inhibitor therapy. Growing evidence suggests that inherited polymorphisms in tamoxifen-metabolizing enzymes identify a subgroup of patients with poor outcome under tamoxifen therapy that might best be treated with an aromatase inhibitor. The emergence of early treatment-related side effects on either aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen, such as hot flashes and anthralgias, has been linked to a decreased risk of recurrence, although additional validation is needed. Summary There are no robust clinically available tools that can be used to reliably identify patients that are likely to be selectively responsive to an aromatase inhibitor over tamoxifen alone. The decision to use an aromatase inhibitor in clinical practice should be primarily guided by consideration of recurrence risk and contraindications to tamoxifen.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 498
页数:8
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]
[Anonymous], 2005, J Clin Oncol, DOI DOI 10.1200/JCO.2005.23.16_SUPPL.510
[3]
Aubert RE., 2009, J. Clin. Oncol, V27
[4]
BARTLETT J, 2009, CANCER RES, V69, P81
[5]
Baum M, 2002, LANCET, V359, P2131
[6]
BAUM M, 1983, LANCET, V2, P450
[7]
HER-2/neu and p53 expression versus tamoxifen resistance in estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer [J].
Berry, DA ;
Muss, HB ;
Thor, AD ;
Dressler, L ;
Liu, ET ;
Broadwater, G ;
Budman, DR ;
Henderson, IC ;
Barcos, M ;
Hayes, D ;
Norton, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (20) :3471-3479
[8]
Switching to an aromatase inhibitor provides mortality benefit in early breast carcinoma - Pooled analysis of 2 consecutive trials [J].
Boccardo, Francesco ;
Rubagotti, Alessandra ;
Aldrighetti, Daniela ;
Buzz, Franco ;
Cruciani, Giorgio ;
Farris, Antonio ;
Mustacchi, Giorgio ;
Porpiglia, Mauro ;
Schieppati, Giorgio ;
Sismondi, Piero .
CANCER, 2007, 109 (06) :1060-1067
[9]
Polymorphism in the CYP2D6 tamoxifen-metabolizing gene influences clinical effect but not hot flashes:: Data from the Italian tamoxifen trial [J].
Bonanni, Bernardo ;
Macis, Debora ;
Maisonneuve, Patrick ;
Johansson, Harriet A. ;
Gucciardo, Giacomo ;
Oliviero, Pasquale ;
Travaglini, Roberto ;
Muraca, Maria G. ;
Rotmensz, Nicole ;
Veronesi, Umberto ;
Decensi, Andrea U. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (22) :3708-3709
[10]
Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer [J].
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Chia, Stephen K. ;
Voduc, David ;
Gao, Dongxia ;
Leung, Samuel ;
Snider, Jacqueline ;
Watson, Mark ;
Davies, Sherri ;
Bernard, Philip S. ;
Parker, Joel S. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Ellis, Matthew J. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (10) :736-750