Dosimetry audit for a multi-centre IMRT head and neck trial

被引:53
作者
Clark, Catharine H. [1 ,3 ]
Hansen, Vibeke Nordmark [3 ]
Chantler, Hannah [4 ]
Edwards, Craig [5 ]
James, Hayley V. [6 ]
Webster, Gareth [7 ]
Miles, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Urbano, M. Teresa Guerrero [2 ]
Bhide, Shree A. [2 ]
Bidmead, A. Margaret [1 ]
Nutting, Christoper M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Phys, London, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiotherapy, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[4] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Cambridge, England
[5] Univ Hosp N Staffordshire, Dept Med Phys, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[6] Ipswich Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Ipswich, Suffolk, England
[7] Christie Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
IMRT; Dosimetry; Quality assurance; Phase III trial; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; VERIFICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; IMPLEMENTATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: PARSPORT was a multi-centre randomised trial in the UK which compared Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy (CRT) for patients with head and neck cancer. The dosimetry audit goals were to verify the plan delivery in participating centres, ascertain what tolerances were suitable for head and neck IMRT trials and develop an IMRT credentialing program. Materials and methods: Centres enrolling patients underwent rigorous quality assurance before joining the trial. Following this each centre was visited for a dosimetry audit, which consisted of treatment planning system tests, fluence verification films, combined field films and dose point measurements. Results: Mean dose point measurements were made at six centres. For the primary planning target volume (PTV) the differences with the planned values for the IMRT and CRT arms were -0.6% (1.8% to -2.4%) and 0.7% (2.0% to -0.9%), respectively. Ninety-four percent of the IMRT fluence films for individual fields passed gamma criterion of 3%/3 mm and 75% of the films for combined fields passed gamma criterion 4%/3 mm (no significant difference between dynamic delivery and step and shoot delivery). Conclusions: This audit suggests that a 3% tolerance could be applied for PTV point doses. For dose distributions tolerances of 3%/3 mm on individual fields and 4%/3 mm for combined fields are proposed for multi-centre head and neck IMRT trials. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Radiotherapy and Oncology 93 (2009) 102-108
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 108
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE CHART CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
AIRD, EGA ;
WILLIAMS, C ;
MOTT, GTM ;
DISCHE, S ;
SAUNDERS, MI .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 36 (03) :235-244
[2]   Quantitative analysis of patient-specific dosimetric IMRT verification [J].
Budgell, GJ ;
Perrin, BA ;
Mott, JHL ;
Fairfoul, J ;
Mackay, RI .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (01) :103-119
[3]  
Clark C, 2008, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V88, pS26
[4]   Pre-trial quality assurance processes for an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) trial: PARSPORT, a UK multicentre Phase III trial comparing conventional radiotherapy and parotid-sparing IMRT for locally advanced head and neck cancer [J].
Clark, C. H. ;
Miles, E. A. ;
Urbano, M. T. Guerrero ;
Bhide, S. A. ;
Bidmead, A. M. ;
Harrington, K. J. ;
Nutting, C. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 82 (979) :585-594
[5]   Agreement criteria between expected and measured field fluences in IMRT of head and neck cancer:: The importance and use of the γ histograms statistical analysis [J].
De Martin, Elena ;
Fiorino, Claudio ;
Broggi, Sara ;
Longobardi, Barbara ;
Pierelli, Alessio ;
Perna, Lucia ;
Cattaneo, Giovanni Mauro ;
Calandrino, Riccardo .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 85 (03) :399-406
[6]   A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation [J].
Depuydt, T ;
Van Esch, A ;
Huyskens, DP .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (03) :309-319
[7]   An inter-centre quality assurance network for IMRT verification: Results of the ESTRO QUASIMODO project [J].
Gillis, S ;
De Wagter, C ;
Bohsung, J ;
Perrin, B ;
Williams, P ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 (03) :340-353
[8]   Independent evaluations of IMRT through the use of an anthropomorphic phantom [J].
Ibbott, Geoffrey S. ;
Molineu, Andrea ;
Followill, David S. .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2006, 5 (05) :481-487
[9]  
ICRU, 44 ICRU
[10]  
James H., 2008, 96 I PHYS ENG MED