Validation in a Multiple Urology Practice Cohort of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Calculator for Predicting Prostate Cancer Detection

被引:40
作者
Eyre, Stephen J. [1 ]
Ankerst, Donna P. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Wei, John T. [7 ]
Nair, Prakash V. [5 ,6 ]
Regan, Meredith M. [2 ,3 ]
Bueti, Gerrardina [1 ]
Tang, Jeffrey [1 ]
Rubin, Mark A. [8 ]
Kearney, Michael [1 ]
Thompson, Ian M. [5 ,6 ]
Sanda, Martin G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Urol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Math, Munich, Germany
[5] UTHSCSA, Dept Urol, San Antonio, TX USA
[6] UTHSCSA, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Antonio, TX USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[8] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
biological markers; early detection of cancer; mass screening; prostate-specific antigen; clinical trials as topic; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; SCREENING TRIAL; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; RISK; SERUM; FINASTERIDE; POPULATION; REGRESSION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.056
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial prostate cancer risk calculator was developed in a clinical trial cohort that does not represent men routinely referred for prostate biopsy. We assessed the generalizability of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial calculator in a cohort more representative of patients referred for consideration of prostate biopsy in American urology practice. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing prostate biopsy by 12 urologists at 5 sites were enrolled in an Early Detection Research Network cohort. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator was validated by examining area underneath the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity and calibration comparing observed vs predicted risk of prostate cancer detection. Results: Cancer incidence was greater (43% vs 22%, p = 0.001) in the Early Detection Research Network validation cohort (645) compared to the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial group (5,519). Early Detection Research Network participants were younger and more racially diverse, and had more abnormal digital rectal examinations and higher prostate specific antigen than Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial participants (all p < 0.001). Cancer severity was worse in the Early Detection Research Network cohort than in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (Gleason 7 or higher 60% vs 21%, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator was superior to prostate specific antigen alone for predicting cancer in the Early Detection Research Network (AUC 0.691 vs 0.655, p = 0.009) and calibration confirmed that the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk score accurately predicted individual risks in the Early Detection Research Network cohort. Conclusions: Differences between the Early Detection Research Network validation cohort and the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial cohort underscore the importance of validating calculator performance in the multicenter urology practice setting. Our findings extend the applicability of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial calculator for measuring the risk of prostate cancer detection on biopsy to the routine American urology practice setting.
引用
收藏
页码:2653 / 2658
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   Development and validation of a nomogram predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy based on patient age, digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen [J].
Karakiewicz, PI ;
Benayoun, S ;
Kattan, MW ;
Perrotte, P ;
Valiquette, L ;
Scardino, PT ;
Cagiannos, I ;
Heinzer, H ;
Tanguay, S ;
Aprikian, AG ;
Huland, H ;
Graefen, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (06) :1930-1934
[12]   VALIDATION TECHNIQUES FOR LOGISTIC-REGRESSION MODELS [J].
MILLER, ME ;
HUI, SL ;
TIERNEY, WM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1991, 10 (08) :1213-1226
[13]   External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in a screened population [J].
Parekh, Dipen J. ;
Ankerst, Donna Pauler ;
Higgins, Betsy A. ;
Hernandez, Javier ;
Canby-Hagino, Edith. ;
Brand, Timothy ;
Troyer, Dean A. ;
Leach, Robin J. ;
Thompson, Ian M. .
UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (06) :1152-1155
[14]   Model to predict prostate biopsy outcome in large screening population with independent validation in referral setting [J].
Porter, CR ;
Gamito, EJ ;
Crawford, ED ;
Bartsch, G ;
Presti, JC ;
Tewari, A ;
O'Donnell, C .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (05) :937-941
[15]   Effect of verification bias on screening for prostate cancer by measurement of prostate-specific antigen [J].
Punglia, RS ;
D'Amico, AV ;
Catalona, WJ ;
Roehl, KA ;
Kuntz, KM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (04) :335-342
[16]   Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study [J].
Schroeder, Fritz H. ;
Hugosson, Jonas ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Tammela, Teuvo L. J. ;
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Nelen, Vera ;
Kwiatkowski, Maciej ;
Lujan, Marcos ;
Lilja, Hans ;
Zappa, Marco ;
Denis, Louis J. ;
Recker, Franz ;
Berenguer, Antonio ;
Maattanen, Liisa ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Aus, Gunnar ;
Villers, Arnauld ;
Rebillard, Xavier ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus ;
Blijenberg, Bert G. ;
Moss, Sue M. ;
de Koning, Harry J. ;
Auvinen, Anssi .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) :1320-1328
[17]   Inventory of prostate cancer predictive tools [J].
Shariat, Shahrokh F. ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Margulis, Vitaly ;
Kattan, Michael W. .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2008, 18 (03) :279-296
[18]   PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AS A SERUM MARKER FOR ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [J].
STAMEY, TA ;
YANG, N ;
HAY, AR ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
FREIHA, FS ;
REDWINE, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 317 (15) :909-916
[19]   Prediction of prostate cancer for patients receiving finasteride: Results from the prostate cancer prevention trial [J].
Thompson, Ian M. ;
Ankerst, Donna Pauler ;
Chi, Chen ;
Goodman, Phyllis J. ;
Tangen, Catherine M. ;
Lippman, Scott M. ;
Lucia, M. Scott ;
Parnes, Howard L. ;
Coltman, Charles A., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (21) :3076-3081
[20]   Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level ≤4.0 ng per milliliter [J].
Thompson, IM ;
Pauler, DK ;
Goodman, PJ ;
Tangen, CM ;
Lucia, MS ;
Parnes, HL ;
Minasian, LM ;
Ford, LG ;
Lippman, SM ;
Crawford, ED ;
Crowley, JJ ;
Coltman, CA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (22) :2239-2246