Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550:: a new non-contact tonometer

被引:51
作者
Jorge, J
Díaz-Rey, JA
González-Méijome, JM
Almeida, JB
Parafita, MA
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Dept Phys Optometry, Sch Sci, P-4710 Braga, Portugal
[2] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Surg Ophthalmol, Sch Opt & Optometry, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
关键词
accuracy; applanation tonometry; intraocular pressure; non-contact tonometry;
D O I
10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00077.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
The aim of the present study was to assess the level of accuracy for measurements of intra-ccular pressure (IOP) obtained with a new non-contact tonometer (NCT) the Reichert AT550(R). Measurements were compared against those obtained with the Reichert Xpert Plus, Goldmann applanation tonometer and Perkins tonometer. Thirty-five university students were assessed with the four tonometers in a randomised order, with non-contact tonometry performed first. Each of the four measurement devices had its own trained clinical observer. Plots of differences of IOP as a function of the mean for each pair of instruments were obtained. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the AT550(R) NCT with contact applanation tonometry (AT) (p > 0.05), displaying the closest level of agreement (as represented by the lowest mean difference and the narrowest confidence interval) with the Goldmann tonometer (limits of agreement, 0.12 +/- 2.17). In conclusion, readings of IOP with the AT550(R) NCT are clinically comparable with those obtained with Goldmann tonometry in a population with IOP within the normal range.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 564
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy [J].
Abbasoglu, KE ;
Bowman, RW ;
Cavanagh, HD ;
McCulley, JP .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (12) :2193-2196
[2]
COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[3]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]
Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer [J].
Cho, P ;
Lui, T .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (01) :51-58
[5]
Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy - A comparison of three different tonometers [J].
Garzozi, HJ ;
Chung, HS ;
Lang, YR ;
Kagemann, L ;
Harris, A .
CORNEA, 2001, 20 (01) :33-36
[6]
KAKAU CET, 1971, ACTA OPHTHALMOL SCAN, V49, P611
[7]
A clinical comparison of the Xpert non-contact tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer after penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Lisle, C ;
Ehlers, N .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 78 (02) :211-215
[8]
Liu JHK, 1999, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V40, P2912
[9]
Mackie SW, 1996, OPHTHAL PHYSL OPT, V16, P171, DOI 10.1016/0275-5408(95)00029-1
[10]
The Pulsair 3000 tonometer - how many readings need to be taken to ensure accuracy of the average? [J].
McCaghrey, GE ;
Matthews, FE .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2001, 21 (04) :334-338