Interactions between hydrophobic and ionic solutes in aqueous guanidinium chloride and urea solutions: Lessons for protein denaturation mechanism

被引:324
作者
O'Brien, Edward P.
Dima, Ruxandra I.
Brooks, Bernard
Thirumalai, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Inst Phys Sci & Technol, Dept Chem & Biochem, Biophys Program, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] NIH, NHLBI, Lab Computat Biol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Chem, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ja069232+
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
In order to clarify the mechanism of denaturant-induced unfolding of proteins we have calculated the interactions between hydrophobic and ionic species in aqueous guanidinium chloride and urea solutions using molecular dynamics simulations. Hydrophobic association is not significantly changed in urea or guanidinium chloride solutions. The strength of interaction between ion pairs is greatly diminished by the guanidinium ion. Although the changes in electrostatic interactions in urea are small, examination of structures, using appropriate pair functions, of urea and water around the solutes show strong hydrogen bonding between urea's carbonyl oxygen and the positively charged solute. Our results strongly suggest protein denaturation occurs by the direct interaction model according to which the most commonly used denaturants unfold proteins by altering electrostatic interactions either by solvating the charged residues or by engaging in hydrogen bonds with the protein backbone. To further validate the direct interaction model we show that, in urea and guanidinium chloride solutions, unfolding of an unusually stable helix (H1) from mouse PrPC (residues 144-153) occurs by hydrogen bonding of denaturants to charged side chains and backbone carbonyl groups.
引用
收藏
页码:7346 / 7353
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Allen MP, 1987, COMPUTER SIMULATIONS, DOI DOI 10.2307/2938686
[2]   How Hofmeister ion interactions affect protein stability [J].
Baldwin, RL .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 71 (04) :2056-2063
[3]   The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea [J].
Bennion, BJ ;
Daggett, V .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (09) :5142-5147
[4]   The Hofmeister series: salt and solvent effects on interfacial phenomena [J].
Cacace, MG ;
Landau, EM ;
Ramsden, JJ .
QUARTERLY REVIEWS OF BIOPHYSICS, 1997, 30 (03) :241-277
[5]   Structural details of urea binding to barnase: a molecular dynamics analysis [J].
Caflisch, A ;
Karplus, M .
STRUCTURE WITH FOLDING & DESIGN, 1999, 7 (05) :477-488
[6]   Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly [J].
Chandler, D .
NATURE, 2005, 437 (7059) :640-647
[7]   Charge density-dependent strength of hydration and biological structure [J].
Collins, KD .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 72 (01) :65-76
[8]   PARTICLE MESH EWALD - AN N.LOG(N) METHOD FOR EWALD SUMS IN LARGE SYSTEMS [J].
DARDEN, T ;
YORK, D ;
PEDERSEN, L .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 98 (12) :10089-10092
[9]   Probing the instabilities in the dynamics of helical fragments from mouse PrPc [J].
Dima, RI ;
Thirumalai, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (43) :15335-15340
[10]  
DUFFY EM, 1993, ISRAEL J CHEM, V33, P323