Improving the Evidence Base in Palliative Care to Inform Practice and Policy: Thinking Outside the Box

被引:38
作者
Aoun, Samar M. [1 ]
Nekolaichuk, Cheryl [2 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Fac Hlth Sci, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[2] Univ Alberta, Div Palliat Care Med, Dept Oncol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Palliative care; research design; evidence-based medicine; randomized controlled trials; complex interventions; mixed methods; OF-LIFE CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; TERMINALLY-ILL PEOPLE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; ONCOLOGY LITERATURE; COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS; DIGNITY THERAPY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; MISSING DATA; RIGOROUS ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.007
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The adoption of evidence-based hierarchies and research methods from other disciplines may not completely translate to complex palliative care settings. The heterogeneity of the palliative care population, complexity of clinical presentations, and fluctuating health states present significant research challenges. The aim of this narrative review was to explore the debate about the use of current evidence-based approaches for conducting research, such as randomized controlled trials and other study designs, in palliative care, and more specifically to 1) describe key myths about palliative care research; 2) highlight substantive challenges of conducting palliative care research, using case illustrations; and 3) propose specific strategies to address some of these challenges. Myths about research in palliative care revolve around evidence hierarchies, sample heterogeneity, random assignment, participant burden, and measurement issues. Challenges arise because of the complex physical, psychological, existential, and spiritual problems faced by patients, families, and service providers. These challenges can be organized according to six general domains: patient, system/organization, context/setting, study design, research team, and ethics. A number of approaches for dealing with challenges in conducting research fall into five separate domains: study design, sampling, conceptual, statistical, and measures and outcomes. Although randomized controlled trials have their place whenever possible, alternative designs may offer more feasible research protocols that can be successfully implemented in palliative care. Therefore, this article highlights "outside the box'' approaches that would benefit both clinicians and researchers in the palliative care field. Ultimately, the selection of research designs is dependent on a clearly articulated research question, which drives the research process. (C) 2014 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1222 / 1235
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
[71]   Attitudes of patients and staff to research in a specialist palliative care unit [J].
Ross, C ;
Cornbleet, M .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 17 (06) :491-497
[72]   Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't - It's about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence [J].
Sackett, DL ;
Rosenberg, WMC ;
Gray, JAM ;
Haynes, RB ;
Richardson, WS .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7023) :71-72
[73]   Latching onto life: living in the area of tension between the possibility of life and the necessity of death [J].
Saeteren, Berit ;
Lindstrom, Unni A. ;
Naden, Dagfinn .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2011, 20 (5-6) :811-818
[74]   Coping Strategies in the Presence of One's Own Impending Death from Cancer [J].
Sand, Lisa ;
Olsson, Mariann ;
Strang, Peter .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2009, 37 (01) :13-22
[75]   Clinician gate-keeping in clinical research is not ethically defensible: an analysis [J].
Sharkey, Kerith ;
Savulescu, Julian ;
Aranda, Sanchia ;
Schofield, Penelope .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2010, 36 (06) :363-366
[76]  
Shelby-James T, 2010, PALLIATIVE CARE CLIN
[77]   How Are Palliative Care Cancer Populations Characterized in Randomized Controlled Trials? A Literature Review [J].
Sigurdardottir, Katrin Ruth ;
Oldervoll, Line ;
Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen ;
Kaasa, Stein ;
Knudsen, Anne Kari ;
Lohre, Erik Torbjorn ;
Loge, Jon Havard ;
Haugen, Dagny Faksvag .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 47 (05) :906-+
[78]  
Staquet M, 2005, ASSESSING QUALITY LI
[79]   Defining the palliative care patient: A systematic review [J].
Van Mechelen, Wouter ;
Aertgeerts, Bert ;
De Ceulaer, Karolien ;
Thoonsen, Bregje ;
Vermandere, Mieke ;
Warmenhoven, Franca ;
Van Rijswijk, Eric ;
De Lepeleire, Jan .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 27 (03) :197-208
[80]   The evaluation of complex interventions in palliative care: An exploration of the potential of case study research strategies [J].
Walshe, Catherine .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 25 (08) :774-781