Differential effects of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2 and IL-6 on responding for rewarding lateral hypothalamic stimulation

被引:73
作者
Anisman, H
Kokkinidis, L
Borowski, T
Merali, Z
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Dept Psychol, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Psychol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Sch Psychol, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Pharmacol, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cytokine; interleukin-1; interleukin-2; interleukin-6; intracranial self stimulation; reward; psychoneuroimmunology;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01114-1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Bacterial endotoxin and interleukin-1 (IL-1) challenge induce a constellation of symptoms associated with illness. While such treatment may result in anhedonia, it is often difficult to dissociate this effect from the anorexia induced by these agents, particularly in paradigms that involve appetitive motivation. The present investigation assessed the effects of several systemically administered cytokines (IL-1 beta, IL-2 and IL-6) on reward processes by evaluating responding for rewarding intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) from the lateral hypothalamus. Systemic administration of interleukin-2 (IL-2) disrupted responding from the medial forebrain bundle, and this disturbance persisted as long as 1 week following initial cytokine treatment. In contrast to reinforced responding, following IL-2 treatment, non-reinforced behavior was unaffected, indicating that the cytokine did not provoke reward-unrelated performance deficits. It was suggested that the effects of IL-2 on ICSS likely do not involve motoric, soporific, attentional or cognitive changes, but instead involve specific actions on motivational arousal. Although IL-6 was previously found to produce mesolimbic dopamine (DA) changes as marked as those induced by IL-2, systemic IL-6 treatment did not influence responding for rewarding brain stimulation. Likewise, although IL-1 at the dosage used reliably induces sickness behavior, responding for rewarding brain stimulation was unaffected. Thus it seems that anhedonia is not necessarily a component of the sickness response associated with IL-1 treatment. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 187
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[31]   CYTOKINES IN SLEEP REGULATION [J].
KRUEGER, JM ;
TAKAHASHI, S ;
KAPAS, L ;
BREDOW, S ;
ROKY, R ;
FANG, JD ;
FLOYD, R ;
RENEGAR, KB ;
GUHATHAKURTA, N ;
NOVITSKY, S ;
OBAL, F .
ADVANCES IN NEUROIMMUNOLOGY, 1995, 5 (02) :171-188
[32]  
Lacosta S., 1995, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, V21, P1397
[33]  
Lacosta S., 1994, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, V20, P955
[34]   A ROLE FOR INTERLEUKIN-2 IN THE REGULATION OF STRIATAL DOPAMINERGIC FUNCTION [J].
LAPCHAK, PA .
NEUROREPORT, 1992, 3 (02) :165-168
[35]   IMMUNOAUTORADIOGRAPHIC LOCALIZATION OF INTERLEUKIN-2-LIKE IMMUNOREACTIVITY AND INTERLEUKIN-2 RECEPTORS (TAC ANTIGEN-LIKE IMMUNOREACTIVITY) IN THE RAT-BRAIN [J].
LAPCHAK, PA ;
ARAUJO, DM ;
QUIRION, R ;
BEAUDET, A .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1991, 44 (01) :173-184
[36]  
LINTHORST ACE, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P2920
[37]   THE EFFECT OF INTERLEUKIN-6 ON PITUITARY-HORMONE RELEASE INVIVO AND INVITRO [J].
LYSON, K ;
MCCANN, SM .
NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 1991, 54 (03) :262-266
[38]   INTRACEREBROVENTRICULAR INTERLEUKIN-1 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST BLOCKS THE ENHANCEMENT OF FEAR CONDITIONING AND INTERFERENCE WITH ESCAPE PRODUCED BY INESCAPABLE SHOCK [J].
MAIER, SF ;
WATKINS, LR .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1995, 695 (02) :279-282
[39]   INDOMETHACIN PREVENTS INCREASED CATECHOLAMINE TURNOVER IN RAT-BRAIN FOLLOWING SYSTEMIC ENDOTOXIN CHALLENGE [J].
MASANA, MI ;
HEYES, MP ;
MEFFORD, IN .
PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1990, 14 (04) :609-621
[40]   EFFECT OF CENTRALLY ADMINISTERED INTERLEUKIN-1 AND ENDOTOXIN ON FOOD-INTAKE OF FASTED RATS [J].
MCCARTHY, DO ;
KLUGER, MJ ;
VANDER, AJ .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1986, 36 (04) :745-749