Estrogen receptor analysis for breast cancer - Current issues and keys to increasing testing accuracy

被引:102
作者
Diaz, LK
Sneige, N
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Pathol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
estrogen receptor; breast cancer; immunohistochemistry; standardization; quality assurance;
D O I
10.1097/00125480-200501000-00003
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The estrogen receptor (ER) is a regulator of cellular growth, proliferation, and differentiation. In addition to having prognostic value, ER is the most important biologic marker of therapeutic response in breast cancer. Some level of measurable ER protein is expressed in 70-80% of human breast. Immunohistochemistry is the current method of choice for ER assessment, and its predictive value has been shown to be superior to that of biochemically based assays. Although accurate ER protein assessment is critical for optimal treatment of patients with breast cancer, studies have demonstrated inter-laboratory variability in ER detection. False-negative results for tumors with low ER protein levels have been a subject of recent concern. Lack of standardization for immunohistochemistry between laboratories is thought to be the major reason for testing errors, although variability in scoring methods and reporting practices, which can affect results, also plays a role. In this article, we review studies addressing interlaboratory variability and recommend optimal testing techniques and reporting procedures for ER testing, with the goal of increasing interlaboratory standardization for ER analysis by immunohistochernistry. We additionally highlight recent biologic, molecular, and gene expression profiling data related to ER in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 19
页数:10
相关论文
共 133 条
[11]  
Bast RC, 1996, J CLIN ONCOL, V14, P2843
[12]   2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: Clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J].
Bast, RC ;
Ravdin, P ;
Hayes, DF ;
Bates, S ;
Fritsche, H ;
Jessup, JM ;
Kemeny, N ;
Locker, GY ;
Mennel, RG ;
Somerfield, MR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1865-1878
[13]   INFLUENCE OF MENSTRUAL-CYCLE, PARITY AND ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE USE ON STEROID-HORMONE RECEPTORS IN NORMAL BREAST [J].
BATTERSBY, S ;
ROBERTSON, BJ ;
ANDERSON, TJ ;
KING, RJB ;
MCPHERSON, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 65 (04) :601-607
[14]   Variability of immunohistochemical reactivity on stored paraffin slides [J].
Bertheau, P ;
Cazals-Hatem, D ;
Meignin, V ;
de Roquancourt, A ;
Vérola, O ;
Lesourd, A ;
Séné, C ;
Brocheriou, C ;
Janin, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (05) :370-374
[15]  
Bevitt DJ, 1997, J PATHOL, V183, P228
[16]   Current perspectives on HER2 testing:: A review of national testing guidelines [J].
Bilous, M ;
Dowsett, M ;
Hanna, W ;
Isola, J ;
Lebeau, A ;
Moreno, A ;
Penault-Llorca, F ;
Rüschoff, J ;
Tomasic, G ;
de Vijver, MV .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2003, 16 (02) :173-182
[17]  
Brouillet JP, 2001, INT J CANCER, V95, P205, DOI 10.1002/1097-0215(20010720)95:4<205::AID-IJC1035>3.0.CO
[18]  
2-Y
[19]   Molecular classification of breast carcinomas using tissue microarrays [J].
Callagy, G ;
Cattaneo, E ;
Daigo, Y ;
Happerfield, L ;
Bobrow, LG ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Caldas, C .
DIAGNOSTIC MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 2003, 12 (01) :27-34
[20]   Estimation of hormone receptor status in fine-needle aspirates and paraffin-embedded sections from breast cancer using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibodies SP1 and SP2 [J].
Cano, G ;
Milanezi, F ;
Leitao, D ;
Ricardo, S ;
Brito, MJ ;
Schmitt, FC .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 29 (04) :207-211