Selective phenotyping for increased efficiency in genetic mapping studies

被引:51
作者
Jin, CF
Lan, H
Attie, AD
Churchill, GA
Bulutuglo, D
Yandell, BS
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Stat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biochem, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Jackson Lab, Bar Harbor, ME 04609 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Hort, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1534/genetics.104.027524
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The power of a genetic mapping study depends on the heritability of the trait, the number of individuals included in the analysis, and the genetic dissimilarity among them. In experiments that involve microarrays or other complex physiological assays, phenotyping can be expensive and time-consuming and may impose limits on the sample size. A random selection of individuals may not provide sufficient power to detect linkage until a large sample size is reached. We present an algorithm for selecting a subset of individuals solely on the basis of genotype data that can achieve substantial improvements in sensitivity compared to a random sample of the same size. The selective phenotyping method involves preferentially selecting individuals to maximize their genotypic dissimilarity. Selective phenotyping is most effective when prior knowledge of genetic architecture allows us to focus on specific genetic regions. However, it can also provide modest improvements in efficiency when applied on a whole-genome basis. Importantly, selective phenotyping does not reduce the efficiency of mapping as compared to a random sample in regions that are not considered in the selection process. In contrast to selective genotyping, inferences based solely on a selectively phenotyped population of individuals are representative of the whole population. The substantial improvement introduced by selective phenotyping is particularly useful when phenotyping is difficult or costly and thus limits the sample size in a genetic mapping study.
引用
收藏
页码:2285 / 2293
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   New technologies to assess genotype-phenotype relationships [J].
Bochner, BR .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2003, 4 (04) :309-314
[2]   Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast [J].
Brem, RB ;
Yvert, G ;
Clinton, R ;
Kruglyak, L .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5568) :752-755
[3]   R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses [J].
Broman, KW ;
Wu, H ;
Sen, S ;
Churchill, GA .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (07) :889-890
[4]   A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses [J].
Broman, KW ;
Speed, TP .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2002, 64 :641-656
[5]   Natural variation in human gene expression assessed in lymphoblastoid cells [J].
Cheung, VG ;
Conlin, LK ;
Weber, TM ;
Arcaro, M ;
Jen, KY ;
Morley, M ;
Spielman, RS .
NATURE GENETICS, 2003, 33 (03) :422-425
[6]  
CHURCHILL GA, 1994, GENETICS, V138, P963
[7]  
Corander J, 2003, GENETICS, V163, P367
[8]   Mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations [J].
Doerge, RW .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2002, 3 (01) :43-52
[9]   Relationship estimation in affected rib pair analysis of late-onset diseases [J].
Goring, HHH ;
Ott, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1997, 5 (02) :69-77
[10]   Genetical genomics: the added value from segregation [J].
Jansen, RC ;
Nap, JP .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2001, 17 (07) :388-391