Quantitative validation of the 3D SAR profile of hyperthermia applicators using the gamma method

被引:23
作者
de Bruijne, Maarten [1 ]
Samaras, Theodoros
Chavannes, Nicolas
van Rhoon, Gerard C.
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hyperthermia Unit, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Phys, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] ITIS, Fdn Res Informat Technol Soc, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/52/11/010
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
For quality assurance of hyperthermia treatment planning systems, quantitative validation of the electromagnetic model of an applicator is essential. The objective of this study was to validate a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) model implementation of the Lucite cone applicator (LCA) for superficial hyperthermia. The validation involved (i) the assessment of the match between the predicted and measured 3D specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution, and (ii) the assessment of the ratio between model power and real-world power. The 3D SAR distribution of seven LCAs was scanned in a phantom bath using the DASY4 dosimetric measurement system. The same set-up was modelled in SEMCAD X. The match between the predicted and the measured SAR distribution was quantified with the gamma method, which combines distance-to-agreement and dose difference criteria. Good quantitative agreement was observed: more than 95% of the measurement points met the acceptance criteria 2mm/2% for all applicators. The ratio between measured and predicted power absorption ranged from 0.75 to 0.92 (mean 0.85). This study shows that quantitative validation of hyperthermia applicator models is feasible and is worth considering as a part of hyperthermia quality assurance procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:3075 / 3088
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   A methodology for verification of radiotherapy dose calculation [J].
Agazaryan, N ;
Ullrich, W ;
Lee, SP ;
Solberg, TD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 101 (03) :356-361
[2]  
*ANSI, 2003, 15282003 ANSI
[3]   A PERFECTLY MATCHED LAYER FOR THE ABSORPTION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC-WAVES [J].
BERENGER, JP .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1994, 114 (02) :185-200
[4]  
*COMAC BME TASK GR, 1992, TREATM PLANN MOD HYP, P49
[5]  
DEBRUJINE M, 2006, PHYS MED BIOL, V22, P15
[6]   A novel approach to accurate portal dosimetry using CCD-camera based EPIDs [J].
Franken, EM ;
de Boer, JCJ ;
Heijmen, BJM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (04) :888-903
[7]   Comparison of MR-thermography and planning calculations in phantoms [J].
Gellermann, J. ;
Weihrauch, M. ;
Cho, C. H. ;
Wlodarczyk, W. ;
Faehling, H. ;
Felix, R. ;
Rudach, V. ;
Weiser, M. ;
Nadobny, J. ;
Wust, P. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (10) :3912-3920
[8]   A practical approach to thermography in a hyperthermia/magnetic resonance hybrid system:: Validation in a heterogeneous phantom [J].
Gellermann, J ;
Wlodarczyk, W ;
Ganter, H ;
Nadobny, J ;
Fähling, H ;
Seebass, M ;
Felix, R ;
Wust, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (01) :267-277
[9]   An inter-centre quality assurance network for IMRT verification: Results of the ESTRO QUASIMODO project [J].
Gillis, S ;
De Wagter, C ;
Bohsung, J ;
Perrin, B ;
Williams, P ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 (03) :340-353
[10]  
Grosclaude F, 1988, INRA Prod Anim, V1, P5