A methodology for verification of radiotherapy dose calculation

被引:2
作者
Agazaryan, N
Ullrich, W
Lee, SP
Solberg, TD
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] BrainLAB AG, Heimstetten, Germany
关键词
intensity-modulated radiosurgery; intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose; calculation; verification;
D O I
10.3171/sup.2004.101.supplement3.0356
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. A methodology for dosimetric verification of radiation therapy plans was developed and implemented. Dosimetric accuracy of clinically active intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) programs was assessed using this methodology. Methods. The methodology included several dosimetric tasks that were performed to assess the dosimetric accuracy of a treatment plan. Absolute dosimetry of the composite plan was performed using an ionization chamber. Film dosimetry was performed for each individual field and for the multifield composite plan. Calculated dose distributions and film measurements were compared using software developed for the specific tasks. Two-dimensional maps of gamma index, dose difference, and distance-to-agreement were calculated and displayed. To date, good agreement between measurements and calculations has been observed in 160 clinical IMRT and IMRS plans. The largest observed absolute dose disagreement was -4.79%. The mean absolute dose difference was 0.26%, with a standard deviation of 1.75%. The authors specify a 3% dose difference and 3-mm distance as the scaling acceptability criteria for the gamma index calculations of the film measurement analysis. The planning and delivery system in clinical use has proven consistently to satisfy these criteria. Conclusions. The dosimetric verification methods and the software tools developed were both quantitative and clinically practical. The measurements and the analysis demonstrated that the IMRT and IMRS planning and delivery system in use was sufficiently accurate for highly conformal treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 361
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Segmental and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivery techniques for micro-multileaf collimator [J].
Agazaryan, N ;
Solberg, TD .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (07) :1758-1767
[2]  
Agazaryan Nzhde, 2003, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V4, P40, DOI 10.1120/1.1525243
[3]   A revision of the γ-evaluation concept for the comparison of dose distributions [J].
Bakai, A ;
Alber, M ;
Nüsslin, F .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (21) :3543-3553
[4]  
BARRY TN, 1994, 1297 NIST
[5]   Interinstitutional variations of sensitometric curves of radiographic dosimetric films [J].
Bos, LJ ;
Danciu, C ;
Cheng, CW ;
Brugmans, MJP ;
van der Horst, A ;
Minken, A ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (08) :1772-1780
[6]   Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: A strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Burman, C ;
Chui, CS ;
Kutcher, G ;
Leibel, S ;
Zelefsky, M ;
LoSasso, T ;
Spirou, S ;
Wu, QW ;
Yang, J ;
Stein, J ;
Mohan, R ;
Fuks, Z ;
Ling, CC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (04) :863-873
[7]   A comparison of three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; arcs vs. noncoplanar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation [J].
Cardinale, RM ;
Benedict, SH ;
Wu, QW ;
Zwicker, RD ;
Gaballa, HE ;
Mohan, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :431-436
[8]   A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation [J].
Depuydt, T ;
Van Esch, A ;
Huyskens, DP .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (03) :309-319
[9]   Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee [J].
Ezzell, GA ;
Galvin, JM ;
Low, D ;
Palta, JR ;
Rosen, I ;
Sharpe, MB ;
Xia, P ;
Xiao, Y ;
Xing, L ;
Yu, CX .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) :2089-2115
[10]  
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 1989, 44 ICRU