Segmental and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivery techniques for micro-multileaf collimator

被引:21
作者
Agazaryan, N [1 ]
Solberg, TD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
radiotherapy; IMRT; leaf sequencing; DMLC; SMLC;
D O I
10.1118/1.1578791
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A leaf sequencing algorithm has been implemented to deliver segmental and dynamic multileaf collimated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SMLC-IMRT and DMLC-IMRT, respectively) using a linear accelerator equipped with a micro-multileaf collimator (mMLC). The implementation extends a previously published algorithm for the SMLC-IMRT to include the dynamic MLC-IMRT method and several dosimetric considerations. The algorithm has been extended to account for the transmitted radiation and minimize the leakage between opposing and neighboring leaves. The underdosage problem associated with the tongue-and-groove design of the MLC is significantly reduced by synchronizing the MLC leaf movements. The workings of the leaf sequencing parameters have been investigated and the results of the planar dosimetric investigations show that the sequencing parameters affect the measured dose distributions as intended. Investigations of clinical cases suggest that SMLC and DMLC delivery methods produce comparable results with leaf sequences obtained by root-mean-square (RMS) errors specification of 1.5% and lower, approximately corresponding to 20 or more segments. For SMLC-IMRT, there is little to be gained by using an RMS error specification smaller than 2%, approximately corresponding to 15 segments; however, more segments directly translate to longer treatment time and more strain on the MLC. The implemented leaf synchronization method does not increase the required monitor units while it reduces the measured TG underdoses from a maximum of 12% to a maximum of 3% observed with single field measurements of representative clinical cases studied. (C) 2003 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1758 / 1767
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
AGAZARYAN N, 2000, P 13 INT C US COMP R
[2]  
AGAZARYAN N, 1999, MED PHYS, V26, P1139
[3]  
Agazaryan Nzhde, 2003, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V4, P40, DOI 10.1120/1.1525243
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, TISS SUBST RAD DOS M
[5]   X-RAY FIELD COMPENSATION WITH MULTILEAF COLLIMATORS [J].
BORTFELD, TR ;
KAHLER, DL ;
WALDRON, TJ ;
BOYER, AL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (03) :723-730
[6]   Interinstitutional variations of sensitometric curves of radiographic dosimetric films [J].
Bos, LJ ;
Danciu, C ;
Cheng, CW ;
Brugmans, MJP ;
van der Horst, A ;
Minken, A ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (08) :1772-1780
[7]   Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with dynamic multileaf collimators [J].
Boyer, AL ;
Yu, CX .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :48-59
[8]   Temporal resolution requirements for intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered by multileaf collimators [J].
Budgell, GJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (07) :1581-1596
[9]   Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: A strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Burman, C ;
Chui, CS ;
Kutcher, G ;
Leibel, S ;
Zelefsky, M ;
LoSasso, T ;
Spirou, S ;
Wu, QW ;
Yang, J ;
Stein, J ;
Mohan, R ;
Fuks, Z ;
Ling, CC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (04) :863-873
[10]   A comparison of three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; arcs vs. noncoplanar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation [J].
Cardinale, RM ;
Benedict, SH ;
Wu, QW ;
Zwicker, RD ;
Gaballa, HE ;
Mohan, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :431-436