Estimating Effective Dose for CT Using Dose-Length Product Compared With Using Organ Doses: Consequences of Adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103 or Dual-Energy Scanning

被引:388
作者
Christner, Jodie A. [1 ]
Kofler, James M. [1 ]
McCollough, Cynthia H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
CT; DLP; dose-length product; dual-energy CT; effective dose; effective dose equivalent; ICRP publication 26; ICRP publication 60; ICRP publication 103; organ dose; tissue-weighting factors; MULTISLICE HELICAL CT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.09.3462
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare dose-length product (DLP)-based estimates of effective dose with organ dose-based calculations using tissue-weighting factors from publication 103 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) or dual-energy CT protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Using scanner-and energy-dependent organ dose coefficients, we calculated effective doses for CT examinations of the head, chest, coronary arteries, liver, and abdomen and pelvis using routine clinical single-or dual-energy protocols and tissue-weighting factors published in 1991 in ICRP publication 60 and in 2007 in ICRP publication 103. Effective doses were also generated from the respective DLPs using published conversion coefficients that depend only on body region. For each examination type, the same volume CT dose index was used for single-and dual-energy scans. RESULTS. Effective doses calculated for CT examinations using organ dose estimates and ICRP 103 tissue-weighting factors differed relative to ICRP 60 values by -39% (-0.5 mSv, head), 14% (1 mSv, chest), 36% (4 mSv, coronary artery), 4% (0.6 mSv, liver), and -7% (-1 mSv, abdomen and pelvis). DLP-based estimates of effective dose, which were derived using ICRP 60-based conversion coefficients, were less than organ dose-based estimates for ICRP 60 by 4% (head), 23% (chest), 37% (coronary artery), 12% (liver), and 19% (abdomen and pelvis) and for ICRP 103 by -34% (head), 37% (chest), 74% (coronary artery), 16% (liver), and 12% (abdomen and pelvis). All results were energy independent. CONCLUSION. These differences in estimates of effective dose suggest the need to reassess DLP to E conversion coefficients when adopting ICRP 103, particularly for scans over the breast. For the evaluated scanner, DLP to E conversion coefficients were energy independent, but ICRP 60-based conversion coefficients underestimated effective dose relative to organ dose-based calculations.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 889
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   Calculation of effective dose [J].
McCollough, CH ;
Schueler, BA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (05) :828-837
[22]   CT DOSE: HOW TO MEASURE, HOW TO REDUCE [J].
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2008, 95 (05) :508-517
[23]   CT dose reduction and dose management tools: Overview of available options [J].
McCollough, Cynthia H. ;
Bruesewitz, Michael R. ;
Kofler, James M., Jr. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 (02) :503-U14
[24]   AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents:: Topics in CT -: Radiation dose in CT1 [J].
McNitt-Gray, MF .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2002, 22 (06) :1541-1553
[25]   Primary radiation outside the imaged volume of a multislice helical CT scan [J].
Nicholson, R ;
Fetherston, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (894) :518-522
[26]   A METHOD FOR DESCRIBING THE DOSES DELIVERED BY TRANSMISSION-X-RAY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
SHOPE, TB ;
GAGNE, RM ;
JOHNSON, GC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (04) :488-495
[27]  
Shrimpton P., 1997, Radiological protection bulletin 193, P16
[28]  
Shrimpton P.C., 2004, EUR. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography funded by the European Commission 2004: contract number FIGMCT2000-20078-CTTIP
[29]  
Shrimpton P C., 2005, NRPB-W67 doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK-2003 review
[30]   Effective Dose and Dose-Length Product in CT [J].
Shrimpton, Paul C. ;
Wall, Barry F. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (02) :604-U417