Impact of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents on Energy and Physical Function in Nondialysis CKD Patients With Anemia: A Systematic Review

被引:52
作者
Gandra, Shravanthi R. [1 ]
Finkelstein, Fredric O. [2 ]
Bennett, Antonia V. [3 ]
Lewis, Eldrin F. [4 ]
Brazg, Tracy [3 ]
Martin, Mona L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Hosp St Raphael, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Hlth Res Associates, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Nondialysis; chronic kidney disease; erythropoiesis-stimulating agents; energy; physical function; anemia; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; RECOMBINANT-HUMAN-ERYTHROPOIETIN; EPOETIN-ALPHA; HEMOGLOBIN LEVEL; HEALTH; THERAPY; CANCER; NORMALIZATION; IMPROVEMENTS;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Previous analyses report the impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) on health-related quality of life across various populations. In this analysis, we review published studies and quantify the effect of ESA therapy on energy/fatigue and physical function in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) related anemia. Study Design: Systematic literature search to identify articles (1980-2008) that evaluated effects of ESAs on patient-reported energy and physical function. Setting & Population: Nondialysis CKD patients with anemia enrolled in prospective trials. Selection Criteria for Studies: Prospective studies measuring energy or physical function with both baseline and follow-up measurement. Intervention: ESA treatment. Outcomes: Improvements in energy and physical function assessed using effect size, a measure of treatment responsiveness. Results: 14 studies were identified: 11 measured energy and 14 measured physical function. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was the most common instrument used to report energy and physical function. Of 11 studies measuring energy, 2 were double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs), 5 were open-label RCTs, and 4 were single-arm open-label studies. Eight of 11 studies reported statistically significant improvements in energy. Effect size for energy ranged from small (0.24) to large (1.90) in ESA-treated groups and was moderate in each arm of the low-versus high-hemoglobin target RCTs. Of 14 studies measuring physical function, 2 were double-blind RCTs, 6 were open-label RCTs, and 6 were single-arm open-label studies. Ten of 14 studies reported statistically significant improvements in physical function. Effect size for physical function ranged from small (0.37) to large (2.38) in ESA-treated groups and was negligible to moderate in each arm of low-versus high-hemoglobin target studies. Limitations: Findings and conclusions were limited by the available evidence. Conclusion: RCTs and single-arm studies indicate that treatment of anemia with ESAs improves energy and physical function in nondialysis CKD patients. Am J Kidney Dis 55: 519-534. (C) 2010 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 534
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
DELANO BG, 1989, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V14, P14
[12]  
Dharmarajan T., 2004, J. Am. Med. Dir\\. Assoc, V5, P395, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70008-0
[13]   Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia [J].
Drueke, Tilman B. ;
Locatelli, Francesco ;
Clyne, Naomi ;
Eckardt, Kai-Uwe ;
Macdougall, Iain C. ;
Tsakiris, Dimitrios ;
Burger, Hans-Ulrich ;
Scherhag, Armin .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (20) :2071-2084
[14]   Regulation of erythropoietin production [J].
Eckardt, KU ;
Kurtz, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2005, 35 :13-19
[15]   Health-Related Quality of Life and Hemoglobin Levels in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients [J].
Finkelstein, Fredric O. ;
Story, Kenneth ;
Firanek, Catherine ;
Mendelssohn, David ;
Barre, Paul ;
Takano, Tomoko ;
Soroka, Steven ;
Mujais, Salim .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 4 (01) :33-38
[16]   MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS [J].
GUYATT, G ;
WALTER, S ;
NORMAN, G .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02) :171-178
[17]   The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research - How meaningful is it? [J].
Hays, RD ;
Woolley, JM .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 18 (05) :419-423
[18]  
Hsu CY, 2002, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V13, P504, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V132504
[19]  
Islam S, 2005, Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull, V31, P83
[20]   MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
SINGER, J ;
GUYATT, GH .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04) :407-415