Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation

被引:152
作者
Ector, Joris
Dragusin, Octavian
Adriaenssens, Bert
Huybrechts, Wim
Willems, Rik
Ector, Hugo
Heidbuechel, Hein
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Cardiol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, AstraZeneca Chair Cardiac Electrophysiol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.040
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study sought to evaluate the impact of obesity on patient radiation dose during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures under fluoroscopic guidance. Background Obesity is a risk factor for AF and its recurrence after ablation. It increases patient radiation dose during fluoroscopic imaging, but this effect has not been quantified for AF ablation procedures. Methods Effective radiation dose and lifetime attributable cancer risk were calculated from dose-area product (DAP) measurements in 85 patients undergoing AF ablation guided by biplane low-frequency pulsed fluoroscopy (3 frames/s). Three dose calculation methods were used (Monte Carlo simulation, dose conversion coefficients, and depth-profile dose curves). Results Median DAP for all patients was 119.6 Gy.cm(2) (range 13.9 to 446.3 Gy.cm(2)) for procedures with a median duration of 4 h and 83 +/- 26 min of fluoroscopy. Body mass index was a more important determinant of DAP than total fluoroscopy time (r = 0.74 vs. 0.37, p < 0.001), with mean DAP values per hour of fluoroscopy of 58 +/- 40 Gy.cm(2), 110 +/- 43 Gy.cm(2), and 184 +/- 79 GY.cm(2) in normal, overweight, and obese patients, respectively. The corresponding effective radiation doses for AF ablation procedures were 15.2 +/- 7.8 mSv, 26.7 +/- 11.6 mSv, and 39.0 +/- 15.2 mSv, respectively (Monte Carlo). Use of conversion coefficients resulted in higher effective dose estimates than other methods, particularly in obese patients. Mean attributable lifetime risk of all-cancer mortality was 0.060%, 0.100%, and 0.149%, depending on weight class. Conclusions Obese patients receive more than twice the effective radiation dose of normal-weight patients during AF ablation procedures. Obesity needs to be considered in the risk-benefit ratio of AF ablation and should prompt further measures to reduce radiation exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 242
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Chronic radiodermatitis following percutaneous coronary interventions: a report of two cases [J].
Aerts, A ;
Decraene, T ;
van den Oord, JJ ;
Dens, J ;
Janssens, S ;
Guelinckx, P ;
Flour, M ;
Degreef, H ;
Garmyn, M .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2003, 17 (03) :340-343
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, NIH PUBL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII, phase 2-Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation
[4]   PERCEPTUAL COMPARISON OF PULSED AND CONTINUOUS FLUOROSCOPY [J].
AUFRICHTIG, R ;
XUE, P ;
THOMAS, CW ;
GILMORE, GC ;
WILSON, DL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (02) :245-256
[5]   Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Doll, R ;
Goodhead, DT ;
Hall, EJ ;
Land, CE ;
Little, JB ;
Lubin, JH ;
Preston, DL ;
Preston, RJ ;
Puskin, JS ;
Ron, E ;
Sachs, RK ;
Samet, JM ;
Setlow, RB ;
Zaider, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (24) :13761-13766
[6]   The impact of cardiology on the collective effective dose in the North of England [J].
Broadhead, DA ;
Chapple, CL ;
Faulkner, K ;
Davies, ML ;
McCallum, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (833) :492-497
[7]   Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation [J].
Cappato, R ;
Calkins, H ;
Chen, SA ;
Davies, W ;
Iesaka, Y ;
Kalman, J ;
Kim, YH ;
Klein, G ;
Packer, D ;
Skanes, A .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (09) :1100-1105
[8]   Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography [J].
Coles, DR ;
Smail, MA ;
Negus, IS ;
Wilde, P ;
Oberhoff, M ;
Karsch, KR ;
Baumbach, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (09) :1840-1845
[9]  
CRISTY M, 1980, NUREGCR1159 ORNLNURE
[10]  
DAVIES AG, 2006, EUR RADIOL 1118