Comparison of bone mineral density and body composition measurements in women obtained from two DXA instruments

被引:27
作者
Gillette-Guyonnet, S
Andrieu, S
Nourhashemi, F
Cantet, C
Grandjean, H
Vellas, B
机构
[1] CHU Purpan Casselardit, Serv Med Interne & Gerontol Clin, Dept Internal Med & Clin Gerontol, F-31300 Toulouse, France
[2] INSERM U558, F-31000 Toulouse, France
关键词
dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; body composition; bone mineral measurements; inter-machine differences;
D O I
10.1016/S0047-6374(02)00199-9
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Information is lacking regarding the comparison of bone mineral and body composition measurements obtained from the different dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems. The purpose of this study is to compare body composition and whole body bone mineral density (BMD) measurements from the hologic QDR-4500 W (DXA H) and the lunar (DXA L) systems. Seven women older than 40 years of age, were scanned on the same day by using DXA H and DXA L by the same observer. Measured total fat mass, percentage fat, whole body fat free soft tissue mass and BMD were similar between machines, but body mass was significantly higher with DXA L than with DXA H (P = 0.0156). This was due to a higher bone mineral content obtained with DXA L. Agreement between the two DXA systems was quantified by using the Bland and Altman method. For each variable, all pairs of measurements were within the 95% confidence limits. These results suggested that we could use the two measurement methods interchangeably. However, due to the bone mineral inter-machine differences, comparisons of DXA measurements from different machines should be interpreted with caution. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 321
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[2]   Bone mineral and body composition measurements: Cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers [J].
Ellis, KJ ;
Shypailo, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (10) :1613-1618
[3]  
Guo S., 1997, AGE NUTR, V8, P12
[4]   VALIDATION OF BODY-COMPOSITION BY DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY (DEXA) [J].
HAARBO, J ;
GOTFREDSEN, A ;
HASSAGER, C ;
CHRISTIANSEN, C .
CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 11 (04) :331-341
[5]  
HAGIWARA S, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P1425
[6]   IMPACT OF HYDRATION STATUS ON BODY-COMPOSITION AS MEASURED BY DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN NORMAL VOLUNTEERS AND PATIENTS ON HEMODIALYSIS [J].
HORBER, FF ;
THOMI, F ;
CASEZ, JP ;
FONTEILLE, J ;
JAEGER, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1992, 65 (778) :895-900
[7]   COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE INVITRO AND INVIVO OF LUNAR DPX AND HOLOGIC QDR-1000 DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETERS [J].
LASKEY, MA ;
FLAXMAN, ME ;
BARBER, RW ;
TRAFFORD, S ;
HAYBALL, MP ;
LYTTLE, KD ;
CRISP, AJ ;
COMPSTON, JE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (767) :1023-1029
[8]   Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition [J].
Laskey, MA .
NUTRITION, 1996, 12 (01) :45-51
[9]   Evaluation of differences between fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers [J].
Mazess, RB ;
Barden, HS .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 67 (04) :291-296
[10]   DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY FOR TOTAL-BODY AND REGIONAL BONE-MINERAL AND SOFT-TISSUE COMPOSITION [J].
MAZESS, RB ;
BARDEN, HS ;
BISEK, JP ;
HANSON, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1990, 51 (06) :1106-1112