Evaluation of differences between fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers

被引:44
作者
Mazess, RB [1 ]
Barden, HS [1 ]
机构
[1] Lunar Corp, Madison, WI 53717 USA
关键词
densitometry; X-ray; bones; osteoporosis; body composition;
D O I
10.1007/s002230001147
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We compared the bone and body composition results in vivo on two bone densitometers using fan-beam geometry (EXPERT and PRODIGY) with those using pencil-beam geometry (DPX). Measurements were made on large groups of adults ranging in weight from about 50 to 120 kg. Both spine and femur neck BMD on the fan-beam densitometers averaged within 1% of the pencil-beam results, and there was no magnitude dependence of the results by Bland-Altman analysis. Total body BMC and BMD on the PRODIGY and DPX were congruent, but on the EXPERT, BMC was about 2% lower and BMD 2% higher than corresponding values on the DPX. Soft-tissue composition was closely congruent for the PRODIGY and DPX; the comparable EXPERT-DPX differences showed greater scatter but no significant magnitude dependence. The smaller fan-angle of the PRODIGY (4 degrees) probably contributed to its better congruence to pencil-beam results compared with the EXPERT (12 degrees).
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 296
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   CROSS CALIBRATION OF QDR-2000 AND QDR-1000 DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY DENSITOMETERS FOR BONE-MINERAL AND SOFT-TISSUE MEASUREMENTS [J].
ABRAHAMSEN, B ;
GRAM, J ;
HANSEN, TB ;
BECKNIELSEN, H .
BONE, 1995, 16 (03) :385-390
[2]   Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) [J].
Barthe, N ;
Braillon, P ;
Ducassou, D ;
BasseCathalinat, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (835) :728-739
[3]   DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN FAN-BEAM AND PENCIL BEAM SCANS [J].
BLAKE, GM ;
PARKER, JC ;
BUXTON, FMA ;
FOGELMAN, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1993, 66 (790) :902-906
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   Cross-calibration of a fan-beam X-ray densitometer with a pencil-beam system [J].
Bouyoucef, SE ;
Cullum, ID ;
Jell, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (822) :522-531
[6]  
DIESSEL E, 1998, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V8, P511
[7]   Bone mineral and body composition measurements: Cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers [J].
Ellis, KJ ;
Shypailo, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (10) :1613-1618
[8]   Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design [J].
Franck, H ;
Munz, M ;
Scherrer, M .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 61 (06) :445-447
[9]  
Fuerst T, 1996, OSTEOPOROS INT S, V6, P202
[10]   ENHANCED PRECISION WITH DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
MAZESS, R ;
CHESNUT, CH ;
MCCLUNG, M ;
GENANT, H .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 51 (01) :14-17